RE: [PATCH net-next] net: Add phys_port identifier to struct net_device and export it to sysfs
From: <hidden>
Date: 2013-06-19 14:30:40
-----Original Message----- From: John Fastabend [mailto:john.fastabend@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2013 12:18 AM To: K, Narendra Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org; bhutchings@solarflare.com; john.r.fastabend@intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: Add phys_port identifier to struct net_device and export it to sysfs On 06/17/2013 11:10 AM, Narendra_K@Dell.com wrote:
[...]
quoted
3. Add a new field 'phys_port' to 'struct net_device' and export it to sysfs: The 'phys_port' will be a universally unique identifier, which would be a MAC-48 or EUI-64 or a 128 bit UUID value, but not restricted to these spaces. It will uniquely identify the physical port used by a network interface. The 'length' of the identifier will be zero if the field is not set for a network interface. This patch implements option 3. It creates a new sysfs attribute 'phys_port' - /sys/class/net/<interface name>/phys_port References: http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=136920998009209&w=2 References: http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=136992041432498&w=2 Signed-off-by: Narendra K <redacted> --- Changes from RFC version: Suggestions from Ben Hutchings - 1. 'struct port_identifier' is changed to be generic instead of restricting it to MAC-48 or EUI-64 or 128 bit UUID. 2. Commit message updated to indicate point 1. 3. 'show_phys_port' function modified to handle zero length instead of returning -EINVAL 4. 'show_phys_port' function made generic to handle all lengths instead 6, 8 or 16 bytes. Hi Ben, I have retained the commit message to indicate that 'dev_id' is being used to indicate the physical port number also. Thank you. include/linux/netdevice.h | 13 +++++++++++++ net/core/net-sysfs.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+)[...]quoted
--- a/net/core/net-sysfs.c +++ b/net/core/net-sysfs.c@@ -334,6 +334,22 @@ static ssize_t store_group(struct device *dev,struct device_attribute *attr,quoted
return netdev_store(dev, attr, buf, len, change_group); }Is there some missing locking here?quoted
+static ssize_t show_phys_port(struct device *dev, + struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf) { + struct net_device *net = to_net_dev(dev); + unsigned char len; +read_lock(&dev_base_lock);quoted
+ if (!dev_isalive(net)) + return -EINVAL; + + len = net->phys_port.port_id_len; + if (!len) + return 0;ret = sysfs_format_mac(buf, net->phys_port.port_id, len); read_unlock(&dev_base_lock); return ret; } Please take a look maybe I missed something.
Hi John, thanks for the pointer. It seems like we need to hold the ' dev_base_lock' here. I missed this initially as I was looking at ' show_broadcast' function . But looks like the 'show_broadcast' function is also missing the lock. Attributes such as 'dev_id' are read with read_lock(&dev_base_lock) generically in netdev_show function. While looking at the use of ' dev_base_lock', the 'write_lock' is being held when the 'netdev' is being added to and removed from 'dev_base_head'. It is also being held when the 'dev->operstate' and 'dev->link_mode' are being changed. The 'read_lock(&dev_base_lock)' needs to be held before the 'dev_isalive(net) ' call because 1. netdev is not removed from 'dev_base_head' when 'show_phys_port' accesses 'netdev->phys_port.port_id' (and port_id_len) 2. show_phys_port function sees a consistent value of 'netdev->phys_port.port_id and netdev->phys_port.port_id_len ' if another execution path changes the value of 'netdev->phys_port.port_id and netdev->phys_port.port_id_len ' with write_lock(&dev_base_lock) held (similar to how dev->operstate is being changed). Is the above understanding correct ? Sorry, if I missed some detail here. With regards, Narendra K Linux Engineering Dell Inc.