[PATCH] eicon: Fixed checkpatch warning

drivers/isdn/hardware/eicon/diva_didd.c:32:6: warning: symbol
'DRIVERRELEASE_DIDD' was not declared. Should it be static?

Signed-off-by: Andreea Hodea <redacted>
---
 drivers/isdn/hardware/eicon/diva_didd.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/isdn/hardware/eicon/diva_didd.c b/drivers/isdn/hardware/eicon/diva_didd.c
index fab6ccf..21468be 100644
--- a/drivers/isdn/hardware/eicon/diva_didd.c
+++ b/drivers/isdn/hardware/eicon/diva_didd.c

@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ static char *main_revision = "$Revision: 1.13.6.4 $";
 static char *DRIVERNAME =
 	"Eicon DIVA - DIDD table (http://www.melware.net)";
 static char *DRIVERLNAME = "divadidd";
-char *DRIVERRELEASE_DIDD = "2.0";
+static char *DRIVERRELEASE_DIDD = "2.0";
 
 MODULE_DESCRIPTION("DIDD table driver for diva drivers");
 MODULE_AUTHOR("Cytronics & Melware, Eicon Networks");

-- 
1.7.10.4

From: Andreea Hodea <redacted>
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 14:34:36 +0200

drivers/isdn/hardware/eicon/diva_didd.c:32:6: warning: symbol
'DRIVERRELEASE_DIDD' was not declared. Should it be static?

Signed-off-by: Andreea Hodea <redacted>

Applied, thanks.

From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 16:56:13 -0400 (EDT)

From: Andreea Hodea <redacted>
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 14:34:36 +0200

quoted

drivers/isdn/hardware/eicon/diva_didd.c:32:6: warning: symbol
'DRIVERRELEASE_DIDD' was not declared. Should it be static?

Signed-off-by: Andreea Hodea <redacted>

Applied, thanks.

I had to revert, did you even try to compile the driver after
this change?

The symbol is refenced by DbgRegister() calls in diddfunc.c, and
a very simple grep would have shown that to you.

Please do not just blindly try to fix checkpatch warnings.