[PATCH] batman-adv: Remove unused variable

The commit ed242d01 removed a node parameter from iterators.
This patch removes a hlist_node struct that is no longer used.

Sparse gives a warning:

net/batman-adv/originator.c:411:21: warning:
	unused variable ‘node_tmp’ [-Wunused-variable]

Signed-off-by: Emil Goode <redacted>
---
 net/batman-adv/originator.c |    1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/batman-adv/originator.c b/net/batman-adv/originator.c
index 43d0f89..96fb80b 100644
--- a/net/batman-adv/originator.c
+++ b/net/batman-adv/originator.c

@@ -408,7 +408,6 @@ int batadv_orig_seq_print_text(struct seq_file *seq, void *offset)
 	struct net_device *net_dev = (struct net_device *)seq->private;
 	struct batadv_priv *bat_priv = netdev_priv(net_dev);
 	struct batadv_hashtable *hash = bat_priv->orig_hash;
-	struct hlist_node *node_tmp;
 	struct hlist_head *head;
 	struct batadv_hard_iface *primary_if;
 	struct batadv_orig_node *orig_node;

-- 
1.7.10.4

Hi Emil,

On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 05:37:41 +0100, Emil Goode wrote:

The commit ed242d01 removed a node parameter from iterators.
This patch removes a hlist_node struct that is no longer used.

Sparse gives a warning:

net/batman-adv/originator.c:411:21: warning:
	unused variable ‘node_tmp’ [-Wunused-variable]

Signed-off-by: Emil Goode <redacted>

On which tree did you base your patch?
I cannot find the commit you are referring to (ed242d01) and the patch does not
apply (neither on net nor net-next).

Other than that the variable is used a couple of lines below (in the code we
have)...

Regards,

-- 
Antonio Quartulli

..each of us alone is worth nothing..
Ernesto "Che" Guevara

Hi Antonio,

The commit ed242d01 is in the linux-next tree and my patch depends on
that commit.

Best regards, Emil

On Wed, 2013-02-06 at 18:22 +0100, Antonio Quartulli wrote:

Hi Emil,

On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 05:37:41 +0100, Emil Goode wrote:

quoted

The commit ed242d01 removed a node parameter from iterators.
This patch removes a hlist_node struct that is no longer used.

Sparse gives a warning:

net/batman-adv/originator.c:411:21: warning:
	unused variable ‘node_tmp’ [-Wunused-variable]

Signed-off-by: Emil Goode <redacted>

On which tree did you base your patch?
I cannot find the commit you are referring to (ed242d01) and the patch does not
apply (neither on net nor net-next).

Other than that the variable is used a couple of lines below (in the code we
have)...

Regards,

Hi Emil,

On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 06:55:53 +0100, Emil Goode wrote:

Hi Antonio,

The commit ed242d01 is in the linux-next tree and my patch depends on
that commit.

Yes, you are right. I was not aware of this commit, because the author
did not CC us (neither netdev) even if he changed the code we maintain.

As far as I can see that commit is in linux-next only.
Therefore it must be applied there.

However, I'd like you to change the commit message and write the full hash of
the commit you are referring to and its subject ("LIKE THIS"). This would make
it easier to find it.


Regards,

Best regards, Emil

On Wed, 2013-02-06 at 18:22 +0100, Antonio Quartulli wrote:

quoted

Hi Emil,

On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 05:37:41 +0100, Emil Goode wrote:

quoted

The commit ed242d01 removed a node parameter from iterators.
This patch removes a hlist_node struct that is no longer used.

Sparse gives a warning:

net/batman-adv/originator.c:411:21: warning:
	unused variable ‘node_tmp’ [-Wunused-variable]

Signed-off-by: Emil Goode <redacted>

On which tree did you base your patch?
I cannot find the commit you are referring to (ed242d01) and the patch does not
apply (neither on net nor net-next).

Other than that the variable is used a couple of lines below (in the code we
have)...

Regards,

-- 
Antonio Quartulli

..each of us alone is worth nothing..
Ernesto "Che" Guevara

Hi Antonio,

If it is easier I can keep an eye on when the commit lands in the
net-next tree and then resend a modified version of the patch.
Or do you want me to resend it now?

Best regards, Emil

On Wed, 2013-02-06 at 20:55 +0100, Antonio Quartulli wrote:

Hi Emil,

On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 06:55:53 +0100, Emil Goode wrote:

quoted

Hi Antonio,

The commit ed242d01 is in the linux-next tree and my patch depends on
that commit.

Yes, you are right. I was not aware of this commit, because the author
did not CC us (neither netdev) even if he changed the code we maintain.

As far as I can see that commit is in linux-next only.
Therefore it must be applied there.

However, I'd like you to change the commit message and write the full hash of
the commit you are referring to and its subject ("LIKE THIS"). This would make
it easier to find it.


Regards,

quoted

Best regards, Emil

On Wed, 2013-02-06 at 18:22 +0100, Antonio Quartulli wrote:

quoted

Hi Emil,

On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 05:37:41 +0100, Emil Goode wrote:

quoted

The commit ed242d01 removed a node parameter from iterators.
This patch removes a hlist_node struct that is no longer used.

Sparse gives a warning:

net/batman-adv/originator.c:411:21: warning:
	unused variable ‘node_tmp’ [-Wunused-variable]

Signed-off-by: Emil Goode <redacted>

On which tree did you base your patch?
I cannot find the commit you are referring to (ed242d01) and the patch does not
apply (neither on net nor net-next).

Other than that the variable is used a couple of lines below (in the code we
have)...

Regards,

Hi Emil, 

On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 10:59:05 +0100, Emil Goode wrote:

Hi Antonio,

If it is easier I can keep an eye on when the commit lands in the
net-next tree and then resend a modified version of the patch.
Or do you want me to resend it now?

Well, that commit should be merged in net-next after the next merge window.

You can resend it now, but be sure to CC Stephen Rothwell
[off-list ref] (the linux-next maintainer) and to clearly state that the
patch is for linux-next.

Thanks.
Cheers,


p.s. try to do not top-post please :-)

Best regards, Emil

On Wed, 2013-02-06 at 20:55 +0100, Antonio Quartulli wrote:

quoted

Hi Emil,

On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 06:55:53 +0100, Emil Goode wrote:

quoted

Hi Antonio,

The commit ed242d01 is in the linux-next tree and my patch depends on
that commit.

Yes, you are right. I was not aware of this commit, because the author
did not CC us (neither netdev) even if he changed the code we maintain.

As far as I can see that commit is in linux-next only.
Therefore it must be applied there.

However, I'd like you to change the commit message and write the full hash of
the commit you are referring to and its subject ("LIKE THIS"). This would make
it easier to find it.


Regards,

quoted

Best regards, Emil

On Wed, 2013-02-06 at 18:22 +0100, Antonio Quartulli wrote:

quoted

Hi Emil,

On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 05:37:41 +0100, Emil Goode wrote:

quoted

The commit ed242d01 removed a node parameter from iterators.
This patch removes a hlist_node struct that is no longer used.

Sparse gives a warning:

net/batman-adv/originator.c:411:21: warning:
	unused variable ‘node_tmp’ [-Wunused-variable]

Signed-off-by: Emil Goode <redacted>

On which tree did you base your patch?
I cannot find the commit you are referring to (ed242d01) and the patch does not
apply (neither on net nor net-next).

Other than that the variable is used a couple of lines below (in the code we
have)...

Regards,

-- 
Antonio Quartulli

..each of us alone is worth nothing..
Ernesto "Che" Guevara

On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 11:10:22PM +0100, Antonio Quartulli wrote:

Hi Emil, 

On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 10:59:05 +0100, Emil Goode wrote:

quoted

Hi Antonio,

If it is easier I can keep an eye on when the commit lands in the
net-next tree and then resend a modified version of the patch.
Or do you want me to resend it now?

Well, that commit should be merged in net-next after the next merge window.

You can resend it now, but be sure to CC Stephen Rothwell
[off-list ref] (the linux-next maintainer) and to clearly state that the
patch is for linux-next.

It doesn't go through Stephen Rothwell.  It goes through Andrew
Morton and it should be CC'd to Sasha Levin.

regards,
dan carpenter