From: Julia Lawall <redacted>
Delete successive tests to the same location. rc was previously tested and
not subsequently updated. efx_phc_adjtime can return an error code, so the
call is updated so that is tested instead.
A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@s exists@
local idexpression y;
expression x,e;
@@
*if ( \(x == NULL\|IS_ERR(x)\|y != 0\) )
{ ... when forall
return ...; }
... when != \(y = e\|y += e\|y -= e\|y |= e\|y &= e\|y++\|y--\|&y\)
when != \(XT_GETPAGE(...,y)\|WMI_CMD_BUF(...)\)
*if ( \(x == NULL\|IS_ERR(x)\|y != 0\) )
{ ... when forall
return ...; }
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <redacted>
---
Not tested. I'm not familiar with this function, so I don't know whether it
is desirable to test its result.
drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ptp.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ptp.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ptp.c
index 0767043..3f93624 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ptp.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ptp.c
@@ -1439,7 +1439,7 @@ static int efx_phc_settime(struct ptp_clock_info *ptp,
delta = timespec_sub(*e_ts, time_now);
- efx_phc_adjtime(ptp, timespec_to_ns(&delta));
+ rc = efx_phc_adjtime(ptp, timespec_to_ns(&delta));
if (rc != 0)
return rc;
On Mon, 2013-01-21 at 14:02 +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
From: Julia Lawall <redacted>
Delete successive tests to the same location. rc was previously tested and
not subsequently updated. efx_phc_adjtime can return an error code, so the
call is updated so that is tested instead.
A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@s exists@
local idexpression y;
expression x,e;
@@
*if ( \(x == NULL\|IS_ERR(x)\|y != 0\) )
{ ... when forall
return ...; }
... when != \(y = e\|y += e\|y -= e\|y |= e\|y &= e\|y++\|y--\|&y\)
when != \(XT_GETPAGE(...,y)\|WMI_CMD_BUF(...)\)
*if ( \(x == NULL\|IS_ERR(x)\|y != 0\) )
{ ... when forall
return ...; }
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <redacted>
Acked-by: Ben Hutchings <redacted>
---
Not tested. I'm not familiar with this function, so I don't know whether it
is desirable to test its result.
Yes, the result should be tested. Thanks.
Ben.
quoted hunk
drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ptp.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ptp.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ptp.c
index 0767043..3f93624 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ptp.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ptp.c
@@ -1439,7 +1439,7 @@ static int efx_phc_settime(struct ptp_clock_info *ptp,
delta = timespec_sub(*e_ts, time_now);
- efx_phc_adjtime(ptp, timespec_to_ns(&delta));
+ rc = efx_phc_adjtime(ptp, timespec_to_ns(&delta));
if (rc != 0)
return rc;
--
Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
From: Julia Lawall <redacted>
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 14:02:48 +0100
From: Julia Lawall <redacted>
Delete successive tests to the same location. rc was previously tested and
not subsequently updated. efx_phc_adjtime can return an error code, so the
call is updated so that is tested instead.
A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
...
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <redacted>
Applied to net-next, thanks.