# Re: \[net-next rfc v7 1/3\] virtio-net: separate fields of sending/receiving queue from virtnet\_info

- From: Jason Wang \<hidden\>
- Date: 2012-12-04 09:23:38 
- List: netdev
- Page: https://ratatoskr.run/netdev/2012/12/3967339
- Thread: https://ratatoskr.run/netdev/2012/11/3963825/t.md

```text
On Tuesday, December 04, 2012 02:13:11 PM Rusty Russell wrote:
> Jason Wang [ref] writes:
> > On Monday, December 03, 2012 12:25:42 PM Rusty Russell wrote:
> >> > +
> >> > +	/* Work struct for refilling if we run low on memory. */
> >> > +	struct delayed_work refill;
> >> 
> >> I can't really see the justificaiton for a refill per queue.  Just have
> >> one work iterate all the queues if it happens, unless it happens often
> >> (in which case, we need to look harder at this anyway).
> > 
> > But during this kind of iteration, we may need enable/disable the napi
> > regardless of whether the receive queue has lots to be refilled. This may
> > add extra latency.
> 
> Sure, but does it actually happen?  We only use the work when we run out
> of memory.  If this happens in normal behaviour we need to change
> something else...

True, I will change to use a global one.

Thanks
> 
> Thanks,
> Rusty.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
```