[PATCH net-next] sockopt: Make SO_BINDTODEVICE readable

Subsystems: networking [general], networking [sockets], the rest

STALE5097d

15 messages, 5 authors, 2012-10-23 · open the first message on its own page

[PATCH net-next] sockopt: Make SO_BINDTODEVICE readable

From: Pavel Emelyanov <hidden>
Date: 2012-10-19 09:56:05

The SO_BINDTODEVICE option is the only SOL_SOCKET one that can be set, but
cannot be get via sockopt API. The only way we can find the device id a
socket is bound to is via sock-diag interface. But the diag works only on
hashed sockets, while the opt in question can be set for yet unhashed one.

That said, in order to know what device a socket is bound to (we do want
to know this in checkpoint-restore project) I propose to make this option
getsockopt-able and report the respective device index.

Another solution to the problem might be to teach the sock-diag reporting
info on unhashed sockets. Should I go this way instead?

Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <redacted>

---
diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
index 8a146cf..c49412c 100644
--- a/net/core/sock.c
+++ b/net/core/sock.c
@@ -1074,6 +1074,9 @@ int sock_getsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,
 	case SO_NOFCS:
 		v.val = sock_flag(sk, SOCK_NOFCS);
 		break;
+	case SO_BINDTODEVICE:
+		v.val = sk->sk_bound_dev_if;
+		break;
 	default:
 		return -ENOPROTOOPT;
 	}

Re: [PATCH net-next] sockopt: Make SO_BINDTODEVICE readable

From: Eric Dumazet <hidden>
Date: 2012-10-19 10:34:53

On Fri, 2012-10-19 at 13:55 +0400, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
quoted hunk
The SO_BINDTODEVICE option is the only SOL_SOCKET one that can be set, but
cannot be get via sockopt API. The only way we can find the device id a
socket is bound to is via sock-diag interface. But the diag works only on
hashed sockets, while the opt in question can be set for yet unhashed one.

That said, in order to know what device a socket is bound to (we do want
to know this in checkpoint-restore project) I propose to make this option
getsockopt-able and report the respective device index.

Another solution to the problem might be to teach the sock-diag reporting
info on unhashed sockets. Should I go this way instead?

Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <redacted>

---
diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
index 8a146cf..c49412c 100644
--- a/net/core/sock.c
+++ b/net/core/sock.c
@@ -1074,6 +1074,9 @@ int sock_getsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,
 	case SO_NOFCS:
 		v.val = sock_flag(sk, SOCK_NOFCS);
 		break;
+	case SO_BINDTODEVICE:
+		v.val = sk->sk_bound_dev_if;
+		break;
 	default:
 		return -ENOPROTOOPT;
 	}
This looks quite reasonable to me.

Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <redacted>

Re: [PATCH net-next] sockopt: Make SO_BINDTODEVICE readable

From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2012-10-22 00:43:53

From: Pavel Emelyanov <redacted>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 13:55:56 +0400
The SO_BINDTODEVICE option is the only SOL_SOCKET one that can be set, but
cannot be get via sockopt API. The only way we can find the device id a
socket is bound to is via sock-diag interface. But the diag works only on
hashed sockets, while the opt in question can be set for yet unhashed one.

That said, in order to know what device a socket is bound to (we do want
to know this in checkpoint-restore project) I propose to make this option
getsockopt-able and report the respective device index.

Another solution to the problem might be to teach the sock-diag reporting
info on unhashed sockets. Should I go this way instead?

Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <redacted>
Applied.  I can't believe we didn't support this when the feature
was added.

I guess we figured that if the application made this setting, then
it knows and doesn't need to query it.

Re: [PATCH net-next] sockopt: Make SO_BINDTODEVICE readable

From: Pavel Emelyanov <hidden>
Date: 2012-10-22 10:20:45

On 10/22/2012 04:43 AM, David Miller wrote:
From: Pavel Emelyanov <redacted>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 13:55:56 +0400
quoted
The SO_BINDTODEVICE option is the only SOL_SOCKET one that can be set, but
cannot be get via sockopt API. The only way we can find the device id a
socket is bound to is via sock-diag interface. But the diag works only on
hashed sockets, while the opt in question can be set for yet unhashed one.

That said, in order to know what device a socket is bound to (we do want
to know this in checkpoint-restore project) I propose to make this option
getsockopt-able and report the respective device index.

Another solution to the problem might be to teach the sock-diag reporting
info on unhashed sockets. Should I go this way instead?

Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <redacted>
Applied.  I can't believe we didn't support this when the feature
was added.

I guess we figured that if the application made this setting, then
it knows and doesn't need to query it.
.
AFAIS such decision (application that configures something knows what it is) was
made for many things. The same is true at least for the SO_ATTACH_FILTER option
and for the shutdown syscall. Both add something to a socket that cannot be queried
back. And I'm now thinking which way for getting one would be better.

Thanks,
Pavel

Re: [PATCH net-next] sockopt: Make SO_BINDTODEVICE readable

From: Brian Haley <hidden>
Date: 2012-10-22 18:04:50

On 10/19/2012 05:55 AM, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
quoted hunk
The SO_BINDTODEVICE option is the only SOL_SOCKET one that can be set, but
cannot be get via sockopt API. The only way we can find the device id a
socket is bound to is via sock-diag interface. But the diag works only on
hashed sockets, while the opt in question can be set for yet unhashed one.

That said, in order to know what device a socket is bound to (we do want
to know this in checkpoint-restore project) I propose to make this option
getsockopt-able and report the respective device index.

Another solution to the problem might be to teach the sock-diag reporting
info on unhashed sockets. Should I go this way instead?

Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <redacted>

---
diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
index 8a146cf..c49412c 100644
--- a/net/core/sock.c
+++ b/net/core/sock.c
@@ -1074,6 +1074,9 @@ int sock_getsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,
 	case SO_NOFCS:
 		v.val = sock_flag(sk, SOCK_NOFCS);
 		break;
+	case SO_BINDTODEVICE:
+		v.val = sk->sk_bound_dev_if;
+		break;
 	default:
 		return -ENOPROTOOPT;
 	}
Doesn't this make the set and get non-symmetrical?  For example, setsockopt()
would take "eth0", but getsockopt() would return 2.  The following patch would
return a string, or -ENODEV if not set.

-Brian

---

Change getsockopt(SO_BINDTODEVICE) to be symmetrical with setsockopt() by
returning the interface name as a string.

Signed-off-by: Brian Haley <redacted>
diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
index c49412c..69b9d92 100644
--- a/net/core/sock.c
+++ b/net/core/sock.c
@@ -505,7 +505,8 @@ struct dst_entry *sk_dst_check(struct sock *sk, u32 cookie)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(sk_dst_check);

-static int sock_bindtodevice(struct sock *sk, char __user *optval, int optlen)
+static int sock_setbindtodevice(struct sock *sk, char __user *optval,
+				int optlen)
 {
 	int ret = -ENOPROTOOPT;
 #ifdef CONFIG_NETDEVICES
@@ -562,6 +563,49 @@ out:
 	return ret;
 }

+static int sock_getbindtodevice(struct sock *sk, char __user *optval,
+				int __user *optlen, int len)
+{
+	int ret = -ENOPROTOOPT;
+#ifdef CONFIG_NETDEVICES
+	struct net *net = sock_net(sk);
+	struct net_device *dev;
+	char devname[IFNAMSIZ];
+
+	ret = 0;
+	if (sk->sk_bound_dev_if == 0)
+		goto out;
+
+	ret = -EINVAL;
+	if (len < IFNAMSIZ)
+		goto out;
+	if (len > IFNAMSIZ)
+		len = IFNAMSIZ;
+
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	dev = dev_get_by_index_rcu(net, sk->sk_bound_dev_if);
+	if (dev)
+		strcpy(dev->name, devname);
+	rcu_read_unlock();
+	ret = -ENODEV;
+	if (!dev)
+		goto out;
+
+	ret = -EFAULT;
+	if (copy_to_user(optval, devname, len))
+		goto out;
+
+	if (put_user(len, optlen))
+		goto out;
+
+	ret = 0;
+
+out:
+#endif
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
 static inline void sock_valbool_flag(struct sock *sk, int bit, int valbool)
 {
 	if (valbool)
@@ -589,7 +633,7 @@ int sock_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,
 	 */

 	if (optname == SO_BINDTODEVICE)
-		return sock_bindtodevice(sk, optval, optlen);
+		return sock_setbindtodevice(sk, optval, optlen);

 	if (optlen < sizeof(int))
 		return -EINVAL;
@@ -1074,9 +1118,10 @@ int sock_getsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int
optname,
 	case SO_NOFCS:
 		v.val = sock_flag(sk, SOCK_NOFCS);
 		break;
+
 	case SO_BINDTODEVICE:
-		v.val = sk->sk_bound_dev_if;
-		break;
+		return sock_getbindtodevice(sk, optval, optlen, len);
+
 	default:
 		return -ENOPROTOOPT;
 	}

Re: [PATCH net-next] sockopt: Make SO_BINDTODEVICE readable

From: Pavel Emelyanov <hidden>
Date: 2012-10-22 20:28:51

On 10/22/2012 10:04 PM, Brian Haley wrote:
On 10/19/2012 05:55 AM, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
quoted
The SO_BINDTODEVICE option is the only SOL_SOCKET one that can be set, but
cannot be get via sockopt API. The only way we can find the device id a
socket is bound to is via sock-diag interface. But the diag works only on
hashed sockets, while the opt in question can be set for yet unhashed one.

That said, in order to know what device a socket is bound to (we do want
to know this in checkpoint-restore project) I propose to make this option
getsockopt-able and report the respective device index.

Another solution to the problem might be to teach the sock-diag reporting
info on unhashed sockets. Should I go this way instead?

Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <redacted>

---
diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
index 8a146cf..c49412c 100644
--- a/net/core/sock.c
+++ b/net/core/sock.c
@@ -1074,6 +1074,9 @@ int sock_getsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,
 	case SO_NOFCS:
 		v.val = sock_flag(sk, SOCK_NOFCS);
 		break;
+	case SO_BINDTODEVICE:
+		v.val = sk->sk_bound_dev_if;
+		break;
 	default:
 		return -ENOPROTOOPT;
 	}
Doesn't this make the set and get non-symmetrical?  For example, setsockopt()
would take "eth0", but getsockopt() would return 2.
It will, but since device name and index are two equal device "IDs" I assumed
it would be OK.

However, some comments inline.
quoted hunk
The following patch would return a string, or -ENODEV if not set.

-Brian

---

Change getsockopt(SO_BINDTODEVICE) to be symmetrical with setsockopt() by
returning the interface name as a string.

Signed-off-by: Brian Haley <redacted>
diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
index c49412c..69b9d92 100644
--- a/net/core/sock.c
+++ b/net/core/sock.c
@@ -505,7 +505,8 @@ struct dst_entry *sk_dst_check(struct sock *sk, u32 cookie)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(sk_dst_check);

-static int sock_bindtodevice(struct sock *sk, char __user *optval, int optlen)
+static int sock_setbindtodevice(struct sock *sk, char __user *optval,
+				int optlen)
 {
 	int ret = -ENOPROTOOPT;
 #ifdef CONFIG_NETDEVICES
@@ -562,6 +563,49 @@ out:
 	return ret;
 }

+static int sock_getbindtodevice(struct sock *sk, char __user *optval,
+				int __user *optlen, int len)
+{
+	int ret = -ENOPROTOOPT;
+#ifdef CONFIG_NETDEVICES
+	struct net *net = sock_net(sk);
+	struct net_device *dev;
+	char devname[IFNAMSIZ];
+
+	ret = 0;
+	if (sk->sk_bound_dev_if == 0)
+		goto out;
It will return 0 if device is not set, thus making it impossible to detect
this situation.
quoted hunk
+	ret = -EINVAL;
+	if (len < IFNAMSIZ)
+		goto out;
+	if (len > IFNAMSIZ)
+		len = IFNAMSIZ;
+
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	dev = dev_get_by_index_rcu(net, sk->sk_bound_dev_if);
+	if (dev)
+		strcpy(dev->name, devname);
+	rcu_read_unlock();
+	ret = -ENODEV;
+	if (!dev)
+		goto out;
+
+	ret = -EFAULT;
+	if (copy_to_user(optval, devname, len))
+		goto out;
+
+	if (put_user(len, optlen))
+		goto out;
What's the point in reporting IFNAMSIZ to the userspace always, taking
into account that this constant is exported there anyway?
quoted hunk
+	ret = 0;
+
+out:
+#endif
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
 static inline void sock_valbool_flag(struct sock *sk, int bit, int valbool)
 {
 	if (valbool)
@@ -589,7 +633,7 @@ int sock_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,
 	 */

 	if (optname == SO_BINDTODEVICE)
-		return sock_bindtodevice(sk, optval, optlen);
+		return sock_setbindtodevice(sk, optval, optlen);

 	if (optlen < sizeof(int))
 		return -EINVAL;
@@ -1074,9 +1118,10 @@ int sock_getsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int
optname,
 	case SO_NOFCS:
 		v.val = sock_flag(sk, SOCK_NOFCS);
 		break;
+
 	case SO_BINDTODEVICE:
-		v.val = sk->sk_bound_dev_if;
-		break;
+		return sock_getbindtodevice(sk, optval, optlen, len);
+
 	default:
 		return -ENOPROTOOPT;
 	}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
.

Re: [PATCH net-next] sockopt: Make SO_BINDTODEVICE readable

From: Eric Dumazet <hidden>
Date: 2012-10-22 20:45:07

On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 14:04 -0400, Brian Haley wrote:
quoted hunk
+	char devname[IFNAMSIZ];
+
+	ret = 0;
+	if (sk->sk_bound_dev_if == 0)
+		goto out;
+
+	ret = -EINVAL;
+	if (len < IFNAMSIZ)
+		goto out;
+	if (len > IFNAMSIZ)
+		len = IFNAMSIZ;
+
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	dev = dev_get_by_index_rcu(net, sk->sk_bound_dev_if);
+	if (dev)
+		strcpy(dev->name, devname);
+	rcu_read_unlock();
+	ret = -ENODEV;
You probably meant

	strcpy(devname, dev->name)

By the way, this is not really safe in case device is renamed

Re: [PATCH net-next] sockopt: Make SO_BINDTODEVICE readable

From: Pavel Emelyanov <hidden>
Date: 2012-10-22 21:10:37

On 10/23/2012 12:45 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 14:04 -0400, Brian Haley wrote:
quoted
+	char devname[IFNAMSIZ];
+
+	ret = 0;
+	if (sk->sk_bound_dev_if == 0)
+		goto out;
+
+	ret = -EINVAL;
+	if (len < IFNAMSIZ)
+		goto out;
+	if (len > IFNAMSIZ)
+		len = IFNAMSIZ;
+
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	dev = dev_get_by_index_rcu(net, sk->sk_bound_dev_if);
+	if (dev)
+		strcpy(dev->name, devname);
+	rcu_read_unlock();
+	ret = -ENODEV;
You probably meant

	strcpy(devname, dev->name)

By the way, this is not really safe in case device is renamed
Good point, actually. Getting a device name may be not very safe in terms of --
once we have the name there's no 100% guarantee, that this name corresponds to the
actual device the socket is bound to (it could be renamed after we strcpy-ed its
name). This problem doesn't exist when we get device index, as it cannot be changed.

Thanks,
Pavel

Re: [PATCH net-next] sockopt: Make SO_BINDTODEVICE readable

From: Brian Haley <hidden>
Date: 2012-10-22 21:20:51

On 10/22/2012 04:45 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 14:04 -0400, Brian Haley wrote:
quoted
+	char devname[IFNAMSIZ];
+
+	ret = 0;
+	if (sk->sk_bound_dev_if == 0)
+		goto out;
+
+	ret = -EINVAL;
+	if (len < IFNAMSIZ)
+		goto out;
+	if (len > IFNAMSIZ)
+		len = IFNAMSIZ;
+
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	dev = dev_get_by_index_rcu(net, sk->sk_bound_dev_if);
+	if (dev)
+		strcpy(dev->name, devname);
+	rcu_read_unlock();
+	ret = -ENODEV;
You probably meant

	strcpy(devname, dev->name)
Yes, that was a stupid mistake, I'll fix it.
By the way, this is not really safe in case device is renamed
It's not much different from what's there:

	setsockopt("foo");

	rename foo -> bar

	index = getsockopt();
	if_indextoname(index) -> "bar"

I more raised the issue since you pass a 'char *' to setsockopt() but an 'int *'
to getsockopt(), I don't think any other value is non-symmetrical like this.

-Brian

Re: [PATCH net-next] sockopt: Make SO_BINDTODEVICE readable

From: Brian Haley <hidden>
Date: 2012-10-22 21:23:42

On 10/22/2012 04:28 PM, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
On 10/22/2012 10:04 PM, Brian Haley wrote:
quoted
On 10/19/2012 05:55 AM, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
quoted
The SO_BINDTODEVICE option is the only SOL_SOCKET one that can be set, but
cannot be get via sockopt API. The only way we can find the device id a
socket is bound to is via sock-diag interface. But the diag works only on
hashed sockets, while the opt in question can be set for yet unhashed one.

That said, in order to know what device a socket is bound to (we do want
to know this in checkpoint-restore project) I propose to make this option
getsockopt-able and report the respective device index.

Another solution to the problem might be to teach the sock-diag reporting
info on unhashed sockets. Should I go this way instead?

Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <redacted>

---
diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
index 8a146cf..c49412c 100644
--- a/net/core/sock.c
+++ b/net/core/sock.c
@@ -1074,6 +1074,9 @@ int sock_getsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,
 	case SO_NOFCS:
 		v.val = sock_flag(sk, SOCK_NOFCS);
 		break;
+	case SO_BINDTODEVICE:
+		v.val = sk->sk_bound_dev_if;
+		break;
 	default:
 		return -ENOPROTOOPT;
 	}
Doesn't this make the set and get non-symmetrical?  For example, setsockopt()
would take "eth0", but getsockopt() would return 2.
It will, but since device name and index are two equal device "IDs" I assumed
it would be OK.

However, some comments inline.
quoted
The following patch would return a string, or -ENODEV if not set.
Sorry, my description is not quite right, this should return something like this
to be correct:

  0 on success
    optlen zero if interface not set
    optlen > zero if set and optval filled-in

  -errno on failure
quoted
+static int sock_getbindtodevice(struct sock *sk, char __user *optval,
+				int __user *optlen, int len)
+{
+	int ret = -ENOPROTOOPT;
+#ifdef CONFIG_NETDEVICES
+	struct net *net = sock_net(sk);
+	struct net_device *dev;
+	char devname[IFNAMSIZ];
+
+	ret = 0;
+	if (sk->sk_bound_dev_if == 0)
+		goto out;
It will return 0 if device is not set, thus making it impossible to detect
this situation.
See below.
quoted
+	ret = -EINVAL;
+	if (len < IFNAMSIZ)
+		goto out;
+	if (len > IFNAMSIZ)
+		len = IFNAMSIZ;
+
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	dev = dev_get_by_index_rcu(net, sk->sk_bound_dev_if);
+	if (dev)
+		strcpy(dev->name, devname);
+	rcu_read_unlock();
+	ret = -ENODEV;
+	if (!dev)
+		goto out;
+
+	ret = -EFAULT;
+	if (copy_to_user(optval, devname, len))
+		goto out;
+
+	if (put_user(len, optlen))
+		goto out;
What's the point in reporting IFNAMSIZ to the userspace always, taking
into account that this constant is exported there anyway?
I should have put an RFC on the patch :)

In the case that there is no interface, the length returned would be zero,
indicating nothing was there.

I can post another version.

-Brian

Re: [PATCH net-next] sockopt: Make SO_BINDTODEVICE readable

From: Eric Dumazet <hidden>
Date: 2012-10-22 21:37:16

On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 17:20 -0400, Brian Haley wrote:
It's not much different from what's there:

	setsockopt("foo");

	rename foo -> bar

	index = getsockopt();
	if_indextoname(index) -> "bar"

I more raised the issue since you pass a 'char *' to setsockopt() but an 'int *'
to getsockopt(), I don't think any other value is non-symmetrical like this.

-Brian
I meant another cpu can be changing dev->name[] content while the
strcpy() is done, and you get a mangled devname, like "for" or "bao"
instead of "foo" or "bar"

But yes, I obviously understood your point about "char *" and "int *"

Re: [PATCH net-next] sockopt: Make SO_BINDTODEVICE readable

From: Brian Haley <hidden>
Date: 2012-10-22 21:47:58

On 10/22/2012 05:37 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 17:20 -0400, Brian Haley wrote:
quoted
It's not much different from what's there:

	setsockopt("foo");

	rename foo -> bar

	index = getsockopt();
	if_indextoname(index) -> "bar"

I more raised the issue since you pass a 'char *' to setsockopt() but an 'int *'
to getsockopt(), I don't think any other value is non-symmetrical like this.

-Brian
I meant another cpu can be changing dev->name[] content while the
strcpy() is done, and you get a mangled devname, like "for" or "bao"
instead of "foo" or "bar"
Even when holding the rcu_read_lock()?  I'd have to hold the rtnl lock there?

-Brian

Re: [PATCH net-next] sockopt: Make SO_BINDTODEVICE readable

From: Eric Dumazet <hidden>
Date: 2012-10-22 21:52:23

On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 17:47 -0400, Brian Haley wrote:
On 10/22/2012 05:37 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
quoted
On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 17:20 -0400, Brian Haley wrote:
quoted
It's not much different from what's there:

	setsockopt("foo");

	rename foo -> bar

	index = getsockopt();
	if_indextoname(index) -> "bar"

I more raised the issue since you pass a 'char *' to setsockopt() but an 'int *'
to getsockopt(), I don't think any other value is non-symmetrical like this.

-Brian
I meant another cpu can be changing dev->name[] content while the
strcpy() is done, and you get a mangled devname, like "for" or "bao"
instead of "foo" or "bar"
Even when holding the rcu_read_lock()?  I'd have to hold the rtnl lock there?
Yes, rcu_read_lock() only makes sure the device doesnt disappear.

But its name can be changed.

You could use a seqcount_t, so that readers dont have to lock rtnl.

But do we really want to return a name here, I am not yet convinced.

Re: [PATCH net-next] sockopt: Make SO_BINDTODEVICE readable

From: Ben Hutchings <hidden>
Date: 2012-10-22 21:58:27

On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 23:52 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 17:47 -0400, Brian Haley wrote:
quoted
On 10/22/2012 05:37 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
quoted
On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 17:20 -0400, Brian Haley wrote:
quoted
It's not much different from what's there:

	setsockopt("foo");

	rename foo -> bar

	index = getsockopt();
	if_indextoname(index) -> "bar"

I more raised the issue since you pass a 'char *' to setsockopt() but an 'int *'
to getsockopt(), I don't think any other value is non-symmetrical like this.

-Brian
I meant another cpu can be changing dev->name[] content while the
strcpy() is done, and you get a mangled devname, like "for" or "bao"
instead of "foo" or "bar"
Even when holding the rcu_read_lock()?  I'd have to hold the rtnl lock there?
Yes, rcu_read_lock() only makes sure the device doesnt disappear.

But its name can be changed.

You could use a seqcount_t, so that readers dont have to lock rtnl.

But do we really want to return a name here, I am not yet convinced.
If setsockopt() takes a name then it makes no sense that getsockopt()
would return an index.  Perhaps an SO_BINDTOIFINDEX would be useful, but
let's not make SO_BINDTODEVICE mean two different things.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.

Re: [PATCH net-next] sockopt: Make SO_BINDTODEVICE readable

From: Brian Haley <hidden>
Date: 2012-10-23 21:43:28

On 10/22/2012 05:52 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
quoted
quoted
I meant another cpu can be changing dev->name[] content while the
strcpy() is done, and you get a mangled devname, like "for" or "bao"
instead of "foo" or "bar"
Even when holding the rcu_read_lock()?  I'd have to hold the rtnl lock there?
Yes, rcu_read_lock() only makes sure the device doesnt disappear.

But its name can be changed.
There's a similar bug in the SIOCGIFNAME/dev_ifname() code too then, but I would
think this rare enough that it doesn't happen in practice.

-Brian
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help