From: Pavel Emelyanov <hidden> Date: 2012-10-19 09:56:05
The SO_BINDTODEVICE option is the only SOL_SOCKET one that can be set, but
cannot be get via sockopt API. The only way we can find the device id a
socket is bound to is via sock-diag interface. But the diag works only on
hashed sockets, while the opt in question can be set for yet unhashed one.
That said, in order to know what device a socket is bound to (we do want
to know this in checkpoint-restore project) I propose to make this option
getsockopt-able and report the respective device index.
Another solution to the problem might be to teach the sock-diag reporting
info on unhashed sockets. Should I go this way instead?
Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <redacted>
---
@@ -1074,6 +1074,9 @@ int sock_getsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,caseSO_NOFCS:v.val=sock_flag(sk,SOCK_NOFCS);break;+caseSO_BINDTODEVICE:+v.val=sk->sk_bound_dev_if;+break;default:return-ENOPROTOOPT;}
From: Eric Dumazet <hidden> Date: 2012-10-19 10:34:53
On Fri, 2012-10-19 at 13:55 +0400, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
quoted hunk
The SO_BINDTODEVICE option is the only SOL_SOCKET one that can be set, but
cannot be get via sockopt API. The only way we can find the device id a
socket is bound to is via sock-diag interface. But the diag works only on
hashed sockets, while the opt in question can be set for yet unhashed one.
That said, in order to know what device a socket is bound to (we do want
to know this in checkpoint-restore project) I propose to make this option
getsockopt-able and report the respective device index.
Another solution to the problem might be to teach the sock-diag reporting
info on unhashed sockets. Should I go this way instead?
Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <redacted>
---
@@ -1074,6 +1074,9 @@ int sock_getsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,caseSO_NOFCS:v.val=sock_flag(sk,SOCK_NOFCS);break;+caseSO_BINDTODEVICE:+v.val=sk->sk_bound_dev_if;+break;default:return-ENOPROTOOPT;}
This looks quite reasonable to me.
Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <redacted>
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Date: 2012-10-22 00:43:53
From: Pavel Emelyanov <redacted>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 13:55:56 +0400
The SO_BINDTODEVICE option is the only SOL_SOCKET one that can be set, but
cannot be get via sockopt API. The only way we can find the device id a
socket is bound to is via sock-diag interface. But the diag works only on
hashed sockets, while the opt in question can be set for yet unhashed one.
That said, in order to know what device a socket is bound to (we do want
to know this in checkpoint-restore project) I propose to make this option
getsockopt-able and report the respective device index.
Another solution to the problem might be to teach the sock-diag reporting
info on unhashed sockets. Should I go this way instead?
Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <redacted>
Applied. I can't believe we didn't support this when the feature
was added.
I guess we figured that if the application made this setting, then
it knows and doesn't need to query it.
From: Pavel Emelyanov <hidden> Date: 2012-10-22 10:20:45
On 10/22/2012 04:43 AM, David Miller wrote:
From: Pavel Emelyanov <redacted>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 13:55:56 +0400
quoted
The SO_BINDTODEVICE option is the only SOL_SOCKET one that can be set, but
cannot be get via sockopt API. The only way we can find the device id a
socket is bound to is via sock-diag interface. But the diag works only on
hashed sockets, while the opt in question can be set for yet unhashed one.
That said, in order to know what device a socket is bound to (we do want
to know this in checkpoint-restore project) I propose to make this option
getsockopt-able and report the respective device index.
Another solution to the problem might be to teach the sock-diag reporting
info on unhashed sockets. Should I go this way instead?
Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <redacted>
Applied. I can't believe we didn't support this when the feature
was added.
I guess we figured that if the application made this setting, then
it knows and doesn't need to query it.
.
AFAIS such decision (application that configures something knows what it is) was
made for many things. The same is true at least for the SO_ATTACH_FILTER option
and for the shutdown syscall. Both add something to a socket that cannot be queried
back. And I'm now thinking which way for getting one would be better.
Thanks,
Pavel
From: Brian Haley <hidden> Date: 2012-10-22 18:04:50
On 10/19/2012 05:55 AM, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
quoted hunk
The SO_BINDTODEVICE option is the only SOL_SOCKET one that can be set, but
cannot be get via sockopt API. The only way we can find the device id a
socket is bound to is via sock-diag interface. But the diag works only on
hashed sockets, while the opt in question can be set for yet unhashed one.
That said, in order to know what device a socket is bound to (we do want
to know this in checkpoint-restore project) I propose to make this option
getsockopt-able and report the respective device index.
Another solution to the problem might be to teach the sock-diag reporting
info on unhashed sockets. Should I go this way instead?
Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <redacted>
---
@@ -1074,6 +1074,9 @@ int sock_getsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,caseSO_NOFCS:v.val=sock_flag(sk,SOCK_NOFCS);break;+caseSO_BINDTODEVICE:+v.val=sk->sk_bound_dev_if;+break;default:return-ENOPROTOOPT;}
Doesn't this make the set and get non-symmetrical? For example, setsockopt()
would take "eth0", but getsockopt() would return 2. The following patch would
return a string, or -ENODEV if not set.
-Brian
---
Change getsockopt(SO_BINDTODEVICE) to be symmetrical with setsockopt() by
returning the interface name as a string.
Signed-off-by: Brian Haley <redacted>
@@ -589,7 +633,7 @@ int sock_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,*/if(optname==SO_BINDTODEVICE)-returnsock_bindtodevice(sk,optval,optlen);+returnsock_setbindtodevice(sk,optval,optlen);if(optlen<sizeof(int))return-EINVAL;
@@ -1074,9 +1118,10 @@ int sock_getsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int
From: Pavel Emelyanov <hidden> Date: 2012-10-22 20:28:51
On 10/22/2012 10:04 PM, Brian Haley wrote:
On 10/19/2012 05:55 AM, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
quoted
The SO_BINDTODEVICE option is the only SOL_SOCKET one that can be set, but
cannot be get via sockopt API. The only way we can find the device id a
socket is bound to is via sock-diag interface. But the diag works only on
hashed sockets, while the opt in question can be set for yet unhashed one.
That said, in order to know what device a socket is bound to (we do want
to know this in checkpoint-restore project) I propose to make this option
getsockopt-able and report the respective device index.
Another solution to the problem might be to teach the sock-diag reporting
info on unhashed sockets. Should I go this way instead?
Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <redacted>
---
@@ -1074,6 +1074,9 @@ int sock_getsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,caseSO_NOFCS:v.val=sock_flag(sk,SOCK_NOFCS);break;+caseSO_BINDTODEVICE:+v.val=sk->sk_bound_dev_if;+break;default:return-ENOPROTOOPT;}
Doesn't this make the set and get non-symmetrical? For example, setsockopt()
would take "eth0", but getsockopt() would return 2.
It will, but since device name and index are two equal device "IDs" I assumed
it would be OK.
However, some comments inline.
quoted hunk
The following patch would return a string, or -ENODEV if not set.
-Brian
---
Change getsockopt(SO_BINDTODEVICE) to be symmetrical with setsockopt() by
returning the interface name as a string.
Signed-off-by: Brian Haley <redacted>
It will return 0 if device is not set, thus making it impossible to detect
this situation.
quoted hunk
+ ret = -EINVAL;+ if (len < IFNAMSIZ)+ goto out;+ if (len > IFNAMSIZ)+ len = IFNAMSIZ;++ rcu_read_lock();+ dev = dev_get_by_index_rcu(net, sk->sk_bound_dev_if);+ if (dev)+ strcpy(dev->name, devname);+ rcu_read_unlock();+ ret = -ENODEV;+ if (!dev)+ goto out;++ ret = -EFAULT;+ if (copy_to_user(optval, devname, len))+ goto out;++ if (put_user(len, optlen))+ goto out;
What's the point in reporting IFNAMSIZ to the userspace always, taking
into account that this constant is exported there anyway?
quoted hunk
+ ret = 0;++out:+#endif++ return ret;+}+ static inline void sock_valbool_flag(struct sock *sk, int bit, int valbool) { if (valbool)
@@ -589,7 +633,7 @@ int sock_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname, */ if (optname == SO_BINDTODEVICE)- return sock_bindtodevice(sk, optval, optlen);+ return sock_setbindtodevice(sk, optval, optlen); if (optlen < sizeof(int)) return -EINVAL;
@@ -1074,9 +1118,10 @@ int sock_getsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int
optname,
case SO_NOFCS:
v.val = sock_flag(sk, SOCK_NOFCS);
break;
+
case SO_BINDTODEVICE:
- v.val = sk->sk_bound_dev_if;
- break;
+ return sock_getbindtodevice(sk, optval, optlen, len);
+
default:
return -ENOPROTOOPT;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
.
From: Eric Dumazet <hidden> Date: 2012-10-22 20:45:07
On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 14:04 -0400, Brian Haley wrote:
quoted hunk
+ char devname[IFNAMSIZ];++ ret = 0;+ if (sk->sk_bound_dev_if == 0)+ goto out;++ ret = -EINVAL;+ if (len < IFNAMSIZ)+ goto out;+ if (len > IFNAMSIZ)+ len = IFNAMSIZ;++ rcu_read_lock();+ dev = dev_get_by_index_rcu(net, sk->sk_bound_dev_if);+ if (dev)+ strcpy(dev->name, devname);+ rcu_read_unlock();+ ret = -ENODEV;
You probably meant
strcpy(devname, dev->name)
By the way, this is not really safe in case device is renamed
From: Pavel Emelyanov <hidden> Date: 2012-10-22 21:10:37
On 10/23/2012 12:45 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 14:04 -0400, Brian Haley wrote:
quoted
+ char devname[IFNAMSIZ];++ ret = 0;+ if (sk->sk_bound_dev_if == 0)+ goto out;++ ret = -EINVAL;+ if (len < IFNAMSIZ)+ goto out;+ if (len > IFNAMSIZ)+ len = IFNAMSIZ;++ rcu_read_lock();+ dev = dev_get_by_index_rcu(net, sk->sk_bound_dev_if);+ if (dev)+ strcpy(dev->name, devname);+ rcu_read_unlock();+ ret = -ENODEV;
You probably meant
strcpy(devname, dev->name)
By the way, this is not really safe in case device is renamed
Good point, actually. Getting a device name may be not very safe in terms of --
once we have the name there's no 100% guarantee, that this name corresponds to the
actual device the socket is bound to (it could be renamed after we strcpy-ed its
name). This problem doesn't exist when we get device index, as it cannot be changed.
Thanks,
Pavel
From: Brian Haley <hidden> Date: 2012-10-22 21:20:51
On 10/22/2012 04:45 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 14:04 -0400, Brian Haley wrote:
quoted
+ char devname[IFNAMSIZ];++ ret = 0;+ if (sk->sk_bound_dev_if == 0)+ goto out;++ ret = -EINVAL;+ if (len < IFNAMSIZ)+ goto out;+ if (len > IFNAMSIZ)+ len = IFNAMSIZ;++ rcu_read_lock();+ dev = dev_get_by_index_rcu(net, sk->sk_bound_dev_if);+ if (dev)+ strcpy(dev->name, devname);+ rcu_read_unlock();+ ret = -ENODEV;
You probably meant
strcpy(devname, dev->name)
Yes, that was a stupid mistake, I'll fix it.
By the way, this is not really safe in case device is renamed
It's not much different from what's there:
setsockopt("foo");
rename foo -> bar
index = getsockopt();
if_indextoname(index) -> "bar"
I more raised the issue since you pass a 'char *' to setsockopt() but an 'int *'
to getsockopt(), I don't think any other value is non-symmetrical like this.
-Brian
From: Brian Haley <hidden> Date: 2012-10-22 21:23:42
On 10/22/2012 04:28 PM, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
On 10/22/2012 10:04 PM, Brian Haley wrote:
quoted
On 10/19/2012 05:55 AM, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
quoted
The SO_BINDTODEVICE option is the only SOL_SOCKET one that can be set, but
cannot be get via sockopt API. The only way we can find the device id a
socket is bound to is via sock-diag interface. But the diag works only on
hashed sockets, while the opt in question can be set for yet unhashed one.
That said, in order to know what device a socket is bound to (we do want
to know this in checkpoint-restore project) I propose to make this option
getsockopt-able and report the respective device index.
Another solution to the problem might be to teach the sock-diag reporting
info on unhashed sockets. Should I go this way instead?
Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <redacted>
---
@@ -1074,6 +1074,9 @@ int sock_getsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,caseSO_NOFCS:v.val=sock_flag(sk,SOCK_NOFCS);break;+caseSO_BINDTODEVICE:+v.val=sk->sk_bound_dev_if;+break;default:return-ENOPROTOOPT;}
Doesn't this make the set and get non-symmetrical? For example, setsockopt()
would take "eth0", but getsockopt() would return 2.
It will, but since device name and index are two equal device "IDs" I assumed
it would be OK.
However, some comments inline.
quoted
The following patch would return a string, or -ENODEV if not set.
Sorry, my description is not quite right, this should return something like this
to be correct:
0 on success
optlen zero if interface not set
optlen > zero if set and optval filled-in
-errno on failure
quoted
+static int sock_getbindtodevice(struct sock *sk, char __user *optval,+ int __user *optlen, int len)+{+ int ret = -ENOPROTOOPT;+#ifdef CONFIG_NETDEVICES+ struct net *net = sock_net(sk);+ struct net_device *dev;+ char devname[IFNAMSIZ];++ ret = 0;+ if (sk->sk_bound_dev_if == 0)+ goto out;
It will return 0 if device is not set, thus making it impossible to detect
this situation.
See below.
quoted
+ ret = -EINVAL;+ if (len < IFNAMSIZ)+ goto out;+ if (len > IFNAMSIZ)+ len = IFNAMSIZ;++ rcu_read_lock();+ dev = dev_get_by_index_rcu(net, sk->sk_bound_dev_if);+ if (dev)+ strcpy(dev->name, devname);+ rcu_read_unlock();+ ret = -ENODEV;+ if (!dev)+ goto out;++ ret = -EFAULT;+ if (copy_to_user(optval, devname, len))+ goto out;++ if (put_user(len, optlen))+ goto out;
What's the point in reporting IFNAMSIZ to the userspace always, taking
into account that this constant is exported there anyway?
I should have put an RFC on the patch :)
In the case that there is no interface, the length returned would be zero,
indicating nothing was there.
I can post another version.
-Brian
From: Eric Dumazet <hidden> Date: 2012-10-22 21:37:16
On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 17:20 -0400, Brian Haley wrote:
It's not much different from what's there:
setsockopt("foo");
rename foo -> bar
index = getsockopt();
if_indextoname(index) -> "bar"
I more raised the issue since you pass a 'char *' to setsockopt() but an 'int *'
to getsockopt(), I don't think any other value is non-symmetrical like this.
-Brian
I meant another cpu can be changing dev->name[] content while the
strcpy() is done, and you get a mangled devname, like "for" or "bao"
instead of "foo" or "bar"
But yes, I obviously understood your point about "char *" and "int *"
From: Brian Haley <hidden> Date: 2012-10-22 21:47:58
On 10/22/2012 05:37 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 17:20 -0400, Brian Haley wrote:
quoted
It's not much different from what's there:
setsockopt("foo");
rename foo -> bar
index = getsockopt();
if_indextoname(index) -> "bar"
I more raised the issue since you pass a 'char *' to setsockopt() but an 'int *'
to getsockopt(), I don't think any other value is non-symmetrical like this.
-Brian
I meant another cpu can be changing dev->name[] content while the
strcpy() is done, and you get a mangled devname, like "for" or "bao"
instead of "foo" or "bar"
Even when holding the rcu_read_lock()? I'd have to hold the rtnl lock there?
-Brian
From: Eric Dumazet <hidden> Date: 2012-10-22 21:52:23
On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 17:47 -0400, Brian Haley wrote:
On 10/22/2012 05:37 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
quoted
On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 17:20 -0400, Brian Haley wrote:
quoted
It's not much different from what's there:
setsockopt("foo");
rename foo -> bar
index = getsockopt();
if_indextoname(index) -> "bar"
I more raised the issue since you pass a 'char *' to setsockopt() but an 'int *'
to getsockopt(), I don't think any other value is non-symmetrical like this.
-Brian
I meant another cpu can be changing dev->name[] content while the
strcpy() is done, and you get a mangled devname, like "for" or "bao"
instead of "foo" or "bar"
Even when holding the rcu_read_lock()? I'd have to hold the rtnl lock there?
Yes, rcu_read_lock() only makes sure the device doesnt disappear.
But its name can be changed.
You could use a seqcount_t, so that readers dont have to lock rtnl.
But do we really want to return a name here, I am not yet convinced.
From: Ben Hutchings <hidden> Date: 2012-10-22 21:58:27
On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 23:52 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 17:47 -0400, Brian Haley wrote:
quoted
On 10/22/2012 05:37 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
quoted
On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 17:20 -0400, Brian Haley wrote:
quoted
It's not much different from what's there:
setsockopt("foo");
rename foo -> bar
index = getsockopt();
if_indextoname(index) -> "bar"
I more raised the issue since you pass a 'char *' to setsockopt() but an 'int *'
to getsockopt(), I don't think any other value is non-symmetrical like this.
-Brian
I meant another cpu can be changing dev->name[] content while the
strcpy() is done, and you get a mangled devname, like "for" or "bao"
instead of "foo" or "bar"
Even when holding the rcu_read_lock()? I'd have to hold the rtnl lock there?
Yes, rcu_read_lock() only makes sure the device doesnt disappear.
But its name can be changed.
You could use a seqcount_t, so that readers dont have to lock rtnl.
But do we really want to return a name here, I am not yet convinced.
If setsockopt() takes a name then it makes no sense that getsockopt()
would return an index. Perhaps an SO_BINDTOIFINDEX would be useful, but
let's not make SO_BINDTODEVICE mean two different things.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
From: Brian Haley <hidden> Date: 2012-10-23 21:43:28
On 10/22/2012 05:52 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
quoted
quoted
I meant another cpu can be changing dev->name[] content while the
strcpy() is done, and you get a mangled devname, like "for" or "bao"
instead of "foo" or "bar"
Even when holding the rcu_read_lock()? I'd have to hold the rtnl lock there?
Yes, rcu_read_lock() only makes sure the device doesnt disappear.
But its name can be changed.
There's a similar bug in the SIOCGIFNAME/dev_ifname() code too then, but I would
think this rare enough that it doesn't happen in practice.
-Brian