xt_nat_init: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000000000000e0
5 messages,
4 authors,
2012-09-13 · open the first message on its own page
Hi Patrick,
This happens in today's linux-next tree and is pretty reproducible.
Bisection has been started.
[ 1.834544] nf_conntrack version 0.5.0 (1786 buckets, 7144 max)
[ 1.835406] ctnetlink v0.93: registering with nfnetlink.
[ 1.836202] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000000000000e0
[ 1.837539] IP: [<ffffffff81a19123>] mutex_lock_interruptible+0x23/0x70
[ 1.838493] PGD 0
[ 1.838983] Oops: 0002 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[ 1.839786] CPU 0
[ 1.840050] Pid: 1, comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 3.6.0-rc5-07686-gdbf978b #58 Bochs Bochs
[ 1.840172] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff81a19123>] [<ffffffff81a19123>] mutex_lock_interruptible+0x23/0x70
[ 1.840172] RSP: 0018:ffff88000d845e40 EFLAGS: 00010202
[ 1.840172] RAX: 0000000000000246 RBX: 00000000000000e0 RCX: ffff88000d848000
[ 1.840172] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000175 RDI: ffffffff81e6bc88
[ 1.840172] RBP: ffff88000d845e50 R08: ffffffff821bd170 R09: 0000000000000000
[ 1.840172] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: dead000000200200 R12: 00000000ffffffff
[ 1.840172] R13: 0000000000000004 R14: ffffffff821c1ce0 R15: 0000000000000000
[ 1.840172] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88000de00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[ 1.840172] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
[ 1.840172] CR2: 00000000000000e0 CR3: 000000000200b000 CR4: 00000000000006f0
[ 1.840172] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
[ 1.840172] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
[ 1.840172] Process swapper/0 (pid: 1, threadinfo ffff88000d844000, task ffff88000d848000)
[ 1.840172] Stack:
[ 1.840172] 00000000000000e0 ffffffff821c1ce0 ffff88000d845e80 ffffffff8187c204
[ 1.840172] 0000000000000000 ffffffff820f7ea0 0000000000000000 ffffffff821c1ce0
[ 1.840172] ffff88000d845ec0 ffffffff8187c334 ffff88000d845eb0 0000000000000000
[ 1.840172] Call Trace:
[ 1.840172] [<ffffffff8187c204>] xt_register_target+0x34/0x70
[ 1.840172] [<ffffffff8187c334>] xt_register_targets+0x34/0x70
[ 1.840172] [<ffffffff8221f336>] ? nf_nat_init+0x12c/0x12c
[ 1.840172] [<ffffffff8221f34b>] xt_nat_init+0x15/0x17
[ 1.840172] [<ffffffff821dcc3e>] do_one_initcall+0x7a/0x134
[ 1.840172] [<ffffffff821dcdfb>] kernel_init+0x103/0x187
[ 1.864014] [<ffffffff821dc615>] ? do_early_param+0x8d/0x8d
[ 1.864014] [<ffffffff81a1dc44>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
[ 1.864014] [<ffffffff821dccf8>] ? do_one_initcall+0x134/0x134
[ 1.864014] [<ffffffff81a1dc40>] ? gs_change+0x13/0x13
[ 1.864014] Code: 8b 65 f8 c9 c3 0f 1f 00 55 31 d2 be 75 01 00 00 48 89 e5 41 54 41 bc ff ff ff ff 53 48 89 fb 48 c7 c7 88 bc e6 81 e8 dd 73 6e ff <f0> 44 0f c1 23 41 83 ec 01 31 d2 48 c7 c7 c8 b7 13 82 41 c1 ec
[ 1.864014] RIP [<ffffffff81a19123>] mutex_lock_interruptible+0x23/0x70
[ 1.864014] RSP <ffff88000d845e40>
[ 1.864014] CR2: 00000000000000e0
Thanks,
Fengguang
Fengguang Wu [off-list ref] wrote: Hi Patrick,
This happens in today's linux-next tree and is pretty reproducible.
[ 1.834544] nf_conntrack version 0.5.0 (1786 buckets, 7144 max)
[ 1.835406] ctnetlink v0.93: registering with nfnetlink.
[ 1.836202] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000000000000e0
[ 1.837539] IP: [<ffffffff81a19123>] mutex_lock_interruptible+0x23/0x70
Should be fixed by
commit 00545bec9412d130c77f72a08d6c8b6ad21d4a1e
Author: Pablo Neira Ayuso [off-list ref]
Subject: netfilter: fix crash during boot if NAT has been compiled built-in
But seems its not yet in net-next. Pablo?
On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 17:16 +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: Hi Patrick,
This happens in today's linux-next tree and is pretty reproducible.
Bisection has been started.
[ 1.834544] nf_conntrack version 0.5.0 (1786 buckets, 7144 max)
[ 1.835406] ctnetlink v0.93: registering with nfnetlink.
[ 1.836202] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000000000000e0
[ 1.837539] IP: [<ffffffff81a19123>] mutex_lock_interruptible+0x23/0x70
[ 1.838493] PGD 0
[ 1.838983] Oops: 0002 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[ 1.839786] CPU 0
[ 1.840050] Pid: 1, comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 3.6.0-rc5-07686-gdbf978b #58 Bochs Bochs
[ 1.840172] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff81a19123>] [<ffffffff81a19123>] mutex_lock_interruptible+0x23/0x70
[ 1.840172] RSP: 0018:ffff88000d845e40 EFLAGS: 00010202
[ 1.840172] RAX: 0000000000000246 RBX: 00000000000000e0 RCX: ffff88000d848000
[ 1.840172] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000175 RDI: ffffffff81e6bc88
[ 1.840172] RBP: ffff88000d845e50 R08: ffffffff821bd170 R09: 0000000000000000
[ 1.840172] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: dead000000200200 R12: 00000000ffffffff
[ 1.840172] R13: 0000000000000004 R14: ffffffff821c1ce0 R15: 0000000000000000
[ 1.840172] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88000de00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[ 1.840172] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
[ 1.840172] CR2: 00000000000000e0 CR3: 000000000200b000 CR4: 00000000000006f0
[ 1.840172] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
[ 1.840172] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
[ 1.840172] Process swapper/0 (pid: 1, threadinfo ffff88000d844000, task ffff88000d848000)
[ 1.840172] Stack:
[ 1.840172] 00000000000000e0 ffffffff821c1ce0 ffff88000d845e80 ffffffff8187c204
[ 1.840172] 0000000000000000 ffffffff820f7ea0 0000000000000000 ffffffff821c1ce0
[ 1.840172] ffff88000d845ec0 ffffffff8187c334 ffff88000d845eb0 0000000000000000
[ 1.840172] Call Trace:
[ 1.840172] [<ffffffff8187c204>] xt_register_target+0x34/0x70
[ 1.840172] [<ffffffff8187c334>] xt_register_targets+0x34/0x70
[ 1.840172] [<ffffffff8221f336>] ? nf_nat_init+0x12c/0x12c
[ 1.840172] [<ffffffff8221f34b>] xt_nat_init+0x15/0x17
[ 1.840172] [<ffffffff821dcc3e>] do_one_initcall+0x7a/0x134
[ 1.840172] [<ffffffff821dcdfb>] kernel_init+0x103/0x187
[ 1.864014] [<ffffffff821dc615>] ? do_early_param+0x8d/0x8d
[ 1.864014] [<ffffffff81a1dc44>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
[ 1.864014] [<ffffffff821dccf8>] ? do_one_initcall+0x134/0x134
[ 1.864014] [<ffffffff81a1dc40>] ? gs_change+0x13/0x13
[ 1.864014] Code: 8b 65 f8 c9 c3 0f 1f 00 55 31 d2 be 75 01 00 00 48 89 e5 41 54 41 bc ff ff ff ff 53 48 89 fb 48 c7 c7 88 bc e6 81 e8 dd 73 6e ff <f0> 44 0f c1 23 41 83 ec 01 31 d2 48 c7 c7 c8 b7 13 82 41 c1 ec
[ 1.864014] RIP [<ffffffff81a19123>] mutex_lock_interruptible+0x23/0x70
[ 1.864014] RSP <ffff88000d845e40>
[ 1.864014] CR2: 00000000000000e0
Thanks,
Fengguang
Wasnt it already solved ?
http://1984.lsi.us.es/git/nf-next/commit/?id=00545bec9412d130c77f72a08d6c8b6ad21d4a1
Just have to wait that netfilter fixes are pushed upstream
Thanks
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 11:30:24AM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote: Fengguang Wu [off-list ref] wrote: quoted Hi Patrick,
This happens in today's linux-next tree and is pretty reproducible.
[ 1.834544] nf_conntrack version 0.5.0 (1786 buckets, 7144 max)
[ 1.835406] ctnetlink v0.93: registering with nfnetlink.
[ 1.836202] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000000000000e0
[ 1.837539] IP: [<ffffffff81a19123>] mutex_lock_interruptible+0x23/0x70
Should be fixed by
commit 00545bec9412d130c77f72a08d6c8b6ad21d4a1e
Author: Pablo Neira Ayuso [off-list ref]
Subject: netfilter: fix crash during boot if NAT has been compiled built-in
But seems its not yet in net-next. Pablo?
I'll request the pull asap.
Wasnt it already solved ?
http://1984.lsi.us.es/git/nf-next/commit/?id=00545bec9412d130c77f72a08d6c8b6ad21d4a1
Just have to wait that netfilter fixes are pushed upstream
OK, sorry. I didn't subscribe many mailing lists and rely on the
search results in google and LKML to avoid duplicate reports..
Thanks,
Fengguang