From: Daniel Borkmann <hidden> Date: 2012-08-09 16:39:13
Here's a quote of the comment about the BUG macro from asm-generic/bug.h:
Don't use BUG() or BUG_ON() unless there's really no way out; one
example might be detecting data structure corruption in the middle
of an operation that can't be backed out of. If the (sub)system
can somehow continue operating, perhaps with reduced functionality,
it's probably not BUG-worthy.
If you're tempted to BUG(), think again: is completely giving up
really the *only* solution? There are usually better options, where
users don't need to reboot ASAP and can mostly shut down cleanly.
In our case, the status flag of a ring buffer slot is managed from both sides,
the kernel space and the user space. This means that even though the kernel
side might work as expected, the user space screws up and changes this flag
right between the send(2) is triggered when the flag is changed to
TP_STATUS_SENDING and a given skb is destructed after some time. Then, this
will hit the BUG macro. Instead, we relax this condition with a WARN_ON_ONCE
macro, so that the user is aware of this situation. I've tested it and the
system still behaves /stable/, so in accordance with the above comment, we
should rather relax this behavior with a warning.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <redacted>
---
net/packet/af_packet.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Date: 2012-08-10 23:54:50
From: Daniel Borkmann <redacted>
Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 18:39:05 +0200
Here's a quote of the comment about the BUG macro from asm-generic/bug.h:
Don't use BUG() or BUG_ON() unless there's really no way out; one
example might be detecting data structure corruption in the middle
of an operation that can't be backed out of. If the (sub)system
can somehow continue operating, perhaps with reduced functionality,
it's probably not BUG-worthy.
If you're tempted to BUG(), think again: is completely giving up
really the *only* solution? There are usually better options, where
users don't need to reboot ASAP and can mostly shut down cleanly.
In our case, the status flag of a ring buffer slot is managed from both sides,
the kernel space and the user space. This means that even though the kernel
side might work as expected, the user space screws up and changes this flag
right between the send(2) is triggered when the flag is changed to
TP_STATUS_SENDING and a given skb is destructed after some time. Then, this
will hit the BUG macro. Instead, we relax this condition with a WARN_ON_ONCE
macro, so that the user is aware of this situation. I've tested it and the
system still behaves /stable/, so in accordance with the above comment, we
should rather relax this behavior with a warning.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <redacted>
I would like this check to simply be deleted completely.
As you said, it's a user changable value, therefore we cannot use it
for kernel side internal consistency checks at all.
From: Daniel Borkmann <hidden> Date: 2012-08-11 07:11:45
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 1:54 AM, David Miller [off-list ref] wrote:
From: Daniel Borkmann <redacted>
Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 18:39:05 +0200
quoted
Here's a quote of the comment about the BUG macro from asm-generic/bug.h:
Don't use BUG() or BUG_ON() unless there's really no way out; one
example might be detecting data structure corruption in the middle
of an operation that can't be backed out of. If the (sub)system
can somehow continue operating, perhaps with reduced functionality,
it's probably not BUG-worthy.
If you're tempted to BUG(), think again: is completely giving up
really the *only* solution? There are usually better options, where
users don't need to reboot ASAP and can mostly shut down cleanly.
In our case, the status flag of a ring buffer slot is managed from both sides,
the kernel space and the user space. This means that even though the kernel
side might work as expected, the user space screws up and changes this flag
right between the send(2) is triggered when the flag is changed to
TP_STATUS_SENDING and a given skb is destructed after some time. Then, this
will hit the BUG macro. Instead, we relax this condition with a WARN_ON_ONCE
macro, so that the user is aware of this situation. I've tested it and the
system still behaves /stable/, so in accordance with the above comment, we
should rather relax this behavior with a warning.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <redacted>
I would like this check to simply be deleted completely.
As you said, it's a user changable value, therefore we cannot use it
for kernel side internal consistency checks at all.
Thanks for the feedback, I will resend a proper patch!
Best,
Daniel