From: Ben Hutchings <hidden> Date: 2012-07-09 20:33:27
On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 06:30 -0700, Andy Cress wrote:
Author: Veaceslav Falico [off-list ref]
Date: Tue Apr 10 08:14:17 2012 +0200
pch_gbe: correctly verify skb->len in vlan case
to avoid bogus transfer length errors.
This check shouldn't be necessary at all. Maybe you should remove it
instead of correcting the check?
Also, these patches are word-wrapped, and would not be applicable in
this form. See Documentation/email-clients.txt.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
From: Andy Cress <hidden> Date: 2012-07-10 15:25:41
That's a good idea. Removing the check is simpler, simpler is better.
Yes, apparently I do need to resubmit with a different email client.
Andy
-----Original Message-----
From: Ben Hutchings [mailto:bhutchings@solarflare.com]
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2012 4:33 PM
To: Andy Cress
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] pch_gbe: vlan skb len fix
On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 06:30 -0700, Andy Cress wrote:
Author: Veaceslav Falico [off-list ref]
Date: Tue Apr 10 08:14:17 2012 +0200
pch_gbe: correctly verify skb->len in vlan case
to avoid bogus transfer length errors.
This check shouldn't be necessary at all. Maybe you should remove it
instead of correcting the check?
Also, these patches are word-wrapped, and would not be applicable in
this form. See Documentation/email-clients.txt.
Ben.