[PATCH V3 1/2] bonding support for IPv6 transmit hashing

Subsystems: bonding driver, networking drivers, the rest

STALE5170d

3 messages, 2 authors, 2012-06-30 · open the first message on its own page

[PATCH V3 1/2] bonding support for IPv6 transmit hashing

From: John <hidden>
Date: 2012-06-30 06:26:38 

diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
index f5a40b9..b138d84 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
@@ -3345,56 +3345,93 @@ static struct notifier_block bond_netdev_notifier = {
  /*---------------------------- Hashing Policies -----------------------------*/

  /*
+ * Hash for the output device based upon layer 2 data
+ */
+static int bond_xmit_hash_policy_l2(struct sk_buff *skb, int count)
+{
+	struct ethhdr *data = (struct ethhdr *)skb->data;
+
+	if (skb_headlen(skb) >= offsetof(struct ethhdr, h_proto))
+		return (data->h_dest[5] ^ data->h_source[5]) % count;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+/*
   * Hash for the output device based upon layer 2 and layer 3 data. If
- * the packet is not IP mimic bond_xmit_hash_policy_l2()
+ * the packet is not IP, fall back on bond_xmit_hash_policy_l2()
   */
  static int bond_xmit_hash_policy_l23(struct sk_buff *skb, int count)
  {
  	struct ethhdr *data = (struct ethhdr *)skb->data;
-	struct iphdr *iph = ip_hdr(skb);
+	struct iphdr *iph;
+	struct ipv6hdr *ipv6h;
+	u32 v6hash;

-	if (skb->protocol == htons(ETH_P_IP)) {
+	if (skb->protocol == htons(ETH_P_IP) &&
+		skb_network_header_len(skb) >= sizeof(struct iphdr)) {
+		iph = ip_hdr(skb);
  		return ((ntohl(iph->saddr ^ iph->daddr) & 0xffff) ^
  			(data->h_dest[5] ^ data->h_source[5])) % count;
-	}
-
-	return (data->h_dest[5] ^ data->h_source[5]) % count;
+	} else if (skb->protocol == htons(ETH_P_IPV6) &&
+		skb_network_header_len(skb) >= sizeof(struct ipv6hdr)) {
+		ipv6h = ipv6_hdr(skb);
+		v6hash =
+			(ipv6h->saddr.s6_addr32[1] ^ ipv6h->daddr.s6_addr32[1]) ^
+			(ipv6h->saddr.s6_addr32[2] ^ ipv6h->daddr.s6_addr32[2]) ^
+			(ipv6h->saddr.s6_addr32[3] ^ ipv6h->daddr.s6_addr32[3]);
+		v6hash = (v6hash >> 16) ^ (v6hash >> 8) ^ v6hash;
+		return (v6hash ^ data->h_dest[5] ^ data->h_source[5]) % count;
+	}
+
+	return bond_xmit_hash_policy_l2(skb, count);
  }

  /*
   * Hash for the output device based upon layer 3 and layer 4 data. If
   * the packet is a frag or not TCP or UDP, just use layer 3 data.  If it is
- * altogether not IP, mimic bond_xmit_hash_policy_l2()
+ * altogether not IP, fall back on bond_xmit_hash_policy_l2()
   */
  static int bond_xmit_hash_policy_l34(struct sk_buff *skb, int count)
  {
-	struct ethhdr *data = (struct ethhdr *)skb->data;
-	struct iphdr *iph = ip_hdr(skb);
-	__be16 *layer4hdr = (__be16 *)((u32 *)iph + iph->ihl);
-	int layer4_xor = 0;
+	u32 layer4_xor = 0;
+	struct iphdr *iph;
+	struct ipv6hdr *ipv6h;

  	if (skb->protocol == htons(ETH_P_IP)) {
+		iph = ip_hdr(skb);
  		if (!ip_is_fragment(iph) &&
-		    (iph->protocol == IPPROTO_TCP ||
-		     iph->protocol == IPPROTO_UDP)) {
+			(iph->protocol == IPPROTO_TCP ||
+			iph->protocol == IPPROTO_UDP)) {
+			__be16 *layer4hdr = (__be16 *)((u32 *)iph + iph->ihl);
+			if (iph->ihl * sizeof(u32) + sizeof(__be16) * 2 >
+				skb_headlen(skb) - skb_network_offset(skb))
+				goto short_header;
  			layer4_xor = ntohs((*layer4hdr ^ *(layer4hdr + 1)));
+		} else if (skb_network_header_len(skb) < sizeof(struct iphdr)) {
+			goto short_header;
  		}
-		return (layer4_xor ^
-			((ntohl(iph->saddr ^ iph->daddr)) & 0xffff)) % count;
-
+		return (layer4_xor ^ ((ntohl(iph->saddr ^ iph->daddr)) & 0xffff)) % count;
+	} else if (skb->protocol == htons(ETH_P_IPV6)) {
+		ipv6h = ipv6_hdr(skb);
+		if (ipv6h->nexthdr == IPPROTO_TCP || ipv6h->nexthdr == IPPROTO_UDP) {
+			__be16 *layer4hdrv6 = (__be16 *)((u8 *)ipv6h + sizeof(struct ipv6hdr));
+			if (sizeof(struct ipv6hdr) + sizeof(__be16) * 2 >
+				skb_headlen(skb) - skb_network_offset(skb))
+				goto short_header;
+			layer4_xor = (*layer4hdrv6 ^ *(layer4hdrv6 + 1));
+		} else if (skb_network_header_len(skb) < sizeof(struct ipv6hdr)) {
+			goto short_header;
+		}
+		layer4_xor ^=
+			(ipv6h->saddr.s6_addr32[1] ^ ipv6h->daddr.s6_addr32[1]) ^
+			(ipv6h->saddr.s6_addr32[2] ^ ipv6h->daddr.s6_addr32[2]) ^
+			(ipv6h->saddr.s6_addr32[3] ^ ipv6h->daddr.s6_addr32[3]);
+		return ((layer4_xor >> 16) ^ (layer4_xor >> 8) ^ layer4_xor) % count;
  	}

-	return (data->h_dest[5] ^ data->h_source[5]) % count;
-}
-
-/*
- * Hash for the output device based upon layer 2 data
- */
-static int bond_xmit_hash_policy_l2(struct sk_buff *skb, int count)
-{
-	struct ethhdr *data = (struct ethhdr *)skb->data;
-
-	return (data->h_dest[5] ^ data->h_source[5]) % count;
+short_header:
+	return bond_xmit_hash_policy_l2(skb, count);
  }

  /*-------------------------- Device entry points ----------------------------*/

Re: [PATCH V3 1/2] bonding support for IPv6 transmit hashing

From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2012-06-30 08:05:19 

If you're going to post multiple patches, give them unique
subject line texts describing what each change does uniquely.
Do not use identical subject lines ever, that is very unhelpful
for the people reading your changes.

From: John <redacted>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 23:17:11 -0700

+ skb_network_header_len(skb) >= sizeof(struct ipv6hdr)) {
+		ipv6h = ipv6_hdr(skb);
+		v6hash =
+ (ipv6h->saddr.s6_addr32[1] ^ ipv6h->daddr.s6_addr32[1]) ^
+ (ipv6h->saddr.s6_addr32[2] ^ ipv6h->daddr.s6_addr32[2]) ^
+ (ipv6h->saddr.s6_addr32[3] ^ ipv6h->daddr.s6_addr32[3]);
+		v6hash = (v6hash >> 16) ^ (v6hash >> 8) ^ v6hash;
+ return (v6hash ^ data->h_dest[5] ^ data->h_source[5]) % count;
Either you formatted this terribly, or your email client corrupted
your patches.

Re: [PATCH V3 1/2] bonding support for IPv6 transmit hashing

From: John Eaglesham <hidden>
Date: 2012-06-30 19:50:14 

On 6/30/2012 1:05 AM, David Miller wrote:
If you're going to post multiple patches, give them unique
subject line texts describing what each change does uniquely.
Do not use identical subject lines ever, that is very unhelpful
for the people reading your changes.

From: John <redacted>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 23:17:11 -0700
quoted
+ skb_network_header_len(skb) >= sizeof(struct ipv6hdr)) {
+		ipv6h = ipv6_hdr(skb);
+		v6hash =
+ (ipv6h->saddr.s6_addr32[1] ^ ipv6h->daddr.s6_addr32[1]) ^
+ (ipv6h->saddr.s6_addr32[2] ^ ipv6h->daddr.s6_addr32[2]) ^
+ (ipv6h->saddr.s6_addr32[3] ^ ipv6h->daddr.s6_addr32[3]);
+		v6hash = (v6hash >> 16) ^ (v6hash >> 8) ^ v6hash;
+ return (v6hash ^ data->h_dest[5] ^ data->h_source[5]) % count;
Either you formatted this terribly, or your email client corrupted
your patches.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Thanks for the feedback. It must have been my mail client formatting 
that incorrectly. I will re-submit with useful subject lines in a method 
that preserves the intended indentation.

John
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help