[PATCH 2/18] gdm72xx: Move away from NLMSG_PUT().

Subsystems: staging subsystem, the rest

STALE5169d

2 messages, 2 authors, 2012-06-27 · open the first message on its own page

[PATCH 2/18] gdm72xx: Move away from NLMSG_PUT().

From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2012-06-27 05:02:06

And use nlmsg_data() while we're here too.

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
---
 drivers/staging/gdm72xx/netlink_k.c |   10 ++++++----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/gdm72xx/netlink_k.c b/drivers/staging/gdm72xx/netlink_k.c
index 292af0f..d0cb48a 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/gdm72xx/netlink_k.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/gdm72xx/netlink_k.c
@@ -127,8 +127,12 @@ int netlink_send(struct sock *sock, int group, u16 type, void *msg, int len)
 	}
 
 	seq++;
-	nlh = NLMSG_PUT(skb, 0, seq, type, len);
-	memcpy(NLMSG_DATA(nlh), msg, len);
+	nlh = nlmsg_put(skb, 0, seq, type, len, 0);
+	if (!nlh) {
+		kfree_skb(skb);
+		return -EMSGSIZE;
+	}
+	memcpy(nlmsg_data(nlh), msg, len);
 
 	NETLINK_CB(skb).pid = 0;
 	NETLINK_CB(skb).dst_group = 0;
@@ -144,7 +148,5 @@ int netlink_send(struct sock *sock, int group, u16 type, void *msg, int len)
 		}
 		ret = 0;
 	}
-
-nlmsg_failure:
 	return ret;
 }
-- 
1.7.10.2

Re: [PATCH 2/18] gdm72xx: Move away from NLMSG_PUT().

From: Javier Martinez Canillas <hidden>
Date: 2012-06-27 11:07:32

On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 7:02 AM, David Miller [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted hunk
And use nlmsg_data() while we're here too.

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
---
 drivers/staging/gdm72xx/netlink_k.c |   10 ++++++----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/gdm72xx/netlink_k.c b/drivers/staging/gdm72xx/netlink_k.c
index 292af0f..d0cb48a 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/gdm72xx/netlink_k.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/gdm72xx/netlink_k.c
@@ -127,8 +127,12 @@ int netlink_send(struct sock *sock, int group, u16 type, void *msg, int len)
       }

       seq++;
-       nlh = NLMSG_PUT(skb, 0, seq, type, len);
-       memcpy(NLMSG_DATA(nlh), msg, len);
+       nlh = nlmsg_put(skb, 0, seq, type, len, 0);
+       if (!nlh) {
+               kfree_skb(skb);
+               return -EMSGSIZE;
+       }
+       memcpy(nlmsg_data(nlh), msg, len);

       NETLINK_CB(skb).pid = 0;
       NETLINK_CB(skb).dst_group = 0;
@@ -144,7 +148,5 @@ int netlink_send(struct sock *sock, int group, u16 type, void *msg, int len)
               }
               ret = 0;
       }
-
-nlmsg_failure:
       return ret;
 }
--
1.7.10.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hi David,

This also solves an skb memory leak since the sk_buff was allocated
before the NLMSG_PUT() macro and not  freed after jumping to the
nlmsg_failure label. I posted a similar patch before:

http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-driver-devel/msg25756.html

and is already on linux-next with commitid:

2da049bd5f9b0dbd688519fdb6688a4895fe8395 staging: gdm72xx: fix an skb
memory leak

Best regards,
Javier
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help