# Re: Difficulties to get 1Gbps on be2net ethernet card

- From: Jean-Michel Hautbois \<hidden\>
- Date: 2012-06-06 10:04:33 
- List: netdev
- Page: https://ratatoskr.run/netdev/2012/06/10896532
- Thread: https://ratatoskr.run/netdev/2012/05/10896071/t.md

```text
2012/5/30 Jean-Michel Hautbois [ref]:
> 2012/5/30  [ref]:
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: <redacted> [mailto:<redacted>] On
>>>Behalf Of Jean-Michel Hautbois
>>>
>>>2012/5/30 Jean-Michel Hautbois [ref]:
>>>
>>>I used vmstat in order to see the differences between the two kernels.
>>>The main difference is the number of interrupts per second.
>>>I have an average of 87500 on 3.2 and 7500 on 2.6, 10 times lower !
>>>I suspect the be2net driver to be the main cause, and I checkes the
>>>/proc/interrupts file in order to be sure.
>>>
>>>I have for eth1-tx on 2.6.26 about 2200 interrupts per second and 23000 on 3.2.
>>>BTW, it is named eth1-q0 on 3.2 (and tx and rx are the same IRQ)
>>>whereas there is eth1-rx0 and eth1-tx on 2.6.26.
>>
>> Yes, there is an issue with be2net interrupt mitigation in the recent code with
>> RX and TX on the same Evt-Q (commit 10ef9ab4). The high interrupt rate happens when a TX blast is
>> done while RX is relatively silent on a queue pair. Interrupt rate due to TX completions is not being
>> mitigated.
>>
>> I have a fix and will send it out soon..
>>
>> thanks,
>> -Sathya
>
> Hi Sathya !
> Thanks for this information !
> I had the correct diagnostic :). I am waiting for your fix.
>

Well, well, well, after having tested several configurations, several
drivers, I have a big difference between an old 2.6.26 kernel and a
newer one (I tried 3.2 and 3.4).

Here is my stream : UDP packets (multicast), 4000 bytes length, MTU
set to 4096. I am sending packets only, nothing on RX.
I send from 1Gbps upto 2.4Gbps and I see no drops in tc with 2.6.26
kernel, but a lot of drops with a newer kernel.
So, I don't know if I missed something in my kernel configuration, but
I have used the 2.6.26 one as a reference, in order to set the same
options (DMA related, etc).

I easily reproduce this problem and setting a bigger txqueuelen solves
it partially.
1Gbps requires a txqueulen of 9000, 2.4Gbps requires more than 20000 !

If you have any idea, I am interested, as this is a big issue for my use case.

JM
```