[PATCH] rfkill: Add handling when rfkill's type is RFKILL_TYPE_ALL.

Subsystems: rfkill, the rest

STALE5221d

3 messages, 2 authors, 2012-05-23 · open the first message on its own page

[PATCH] rfkill: Add handling when rfkill's type is RFKILL_TYPE_ALL.

From: Alex Hung <hidden>
Date: 2012-05-21 08:37:31

This rfkill type is supposed to be able to toggles the status of all wireless
devices; however, no wireless devices will register itself with type 
RFKILL_TYPE_ALL and thus it was previously ignored in __rfkill_switch_all.

Signed-off-by: Alex Hung <redacted>
---
 net/rfkill/core.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/rfkill/core.c b/net/rfkill/core.c
index 5be1957..84dd71a 100644
--- a/net/rfkill/core.c
+++ b/net/rfkill/core.c
@@ -324,7 +324,7 @@ static void __rfkill_switch_all(const enum rfkill_type type, bool blocked)
 
 	rfkill_global_states[type].cur = blocked;
 	list_for_each_entry(rfkill, &rfkill_list, node) {
-		if (rfkill->type != type)
+		if (rfkill->type != type && type != RFKILL_TYPE_ALL)
 			continue;
 
 		rfkill_set_block(rfkill, blocked);
-- 
1.7.0.4

Re: [PATCH] rfkill: Add handling when rfkill's type is RFKILL_TYPE_ALL.

From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Date: 2012-05-22 18:47:13

On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 16:37 +0800, Alex Hung wrote:
quoted hunk
This rfkill type is supposed to be able to toggles the status of all wireless
devices; however, no wireless devices will register itself with type 
RFKILL_TYPE_ALL and thus it was previously ignored in __rfkill_switch_all.

Signed-off-by: Alex Hung <redacted>
---
 net/rfkill/core.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/rfkill/core.c b/net/rfkill/core.c
index 5be1957..84dd71a 100644
--- a/net/rfkill/core.c
+++ b/net/rfkill/core.c
@@ -324,7 +324,7 @@ static void __rfkill_switch_all(const enum rfkill_type type, bool blocked)
 
 	rfkill_global_states[type].cur = blocked;
 	list_for_each_entry(rfkill, &rfkill_list, node) {
-		if (rfkill->type != type)
+		if (rfkill->type != type && type != RFKILL_TYPE_ALL)
 			continue;
Sorry, I accidentally replied to this in private and then Alex replied
but it all got lost.

He said he was going to change the eeepc use KEY_RFKILL instead of
KEY_WLAN to switch all types...

So I guess what this change really does is make __rfkill_switch_all() be
able to not only switch all devices of a given type, but also be able to
switch all devices of all types.

Alex, can you please rewrite the commit log to make that clearer?

johannes

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [PATCH] rfkill: Add handling when rfkill's type is RFKILL_TYPE_ALL.

From: Alex Hung <hidden>
Date: 2012-05-23 06:12:52

On 05/23/2012 02:46 AM, Johannes Berg wrote:
On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 16:37 +0800, Alex Hung wrote:
quoted
This rfkill type is supposed to be able to toggles the status of all wireless
devices; however, no wireless devices will register itself with type
RFKILL_TYPE_ALL and thus it was previously ignored in __rfkill_switch_all.

Signed-off-by: Alex Hung<redacted>
---
  net/rfkill/core.c |    2 +-
  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/rfkill/core.c b/net/rfkill/core.c
index 5be1957..84dd71a 100644
--- a/net/rfkill/core.c
+++ b/net/rfkill/core.c
@@ -324,7 +324,7 @@ static void __rfkill_switch_all(const enum rfkill_type type, bool blocked)

  	rfkill_global_states[type].cur = blocked;
  	list_for_each_entry(rfkill,&rfkill_list, node) {
-		if (rfkill->type != type)
+		if (rfkill->type != type&&  type != RFKILL_TYPE_ALL)
  			continue;
Sorry, I accidentally replied to this in private and then Alex replied
but it all got lost.

He said he was going to change the eeepc use KEY_RFKILL instead of
KEY_WLAN to switch all types...

So I guess what this change really does is make __rfkill_switch_all() be
able to not only switch all devices of a given type, but also be able to
switch all devices of all types.

Alex, can you please rewrite the commit log to make that clearer?

johannes
Thanks for your feedback, I re-wrote the comments to clarify the changes 
and re-submitted.

Cheers,
Alex Hung
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help