Re: [PATCH 3/4 v2 net-next] net: make GRO aware of skb->head_frag
From: Alexander Duyck <hidden>
Date: 2012-05-02 16:16:34
On 05/02/2012 01:24 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Tue, 2012-05-01 at 12:45 -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:quoted
I have a hacked together ixgbe up and running now with the new build_skb logic and RSC/LRO disabled. It looks like it is giving me a 5% performance boost for small packet routing, but I am using more CPU for netperf TCP receive tests and I was wondering if you had seen anything similar on the tg3 driver?Really hard to say, numbers are so small on Gb link : what do you use to make your numbers ? netperf -H 172.30.42.23 -t OMNI -C -c OMNI Send TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to 172.30.42.23 (172.30.42.23) port 0 AF_INET Local Local Local Elapsed Throughput Throughput Local Local Remote Remote Local Remote Service Send Socket Send Socket Send Time Units CPU CPU CPU CPU Service Service Demand Size Size Size (sec) Util Util Util Util Demand Demand Units Final Final % Method % Method 1700840 1700840 16384 10.01 931.60 10^6bits/s 4.50 S 1.32 S 1.582 2.783 usec/KB About ixgbe, feel free to send your patch ;) Thanks !
I was working with the out-of-tree ixgbe because I have the option there of stripping out FCoE and RSC via a couple of build flags. The problem is I don't know if the head frag stuff will work out very well with ixgbe because RSC and FCoE require that we have to use 1K aligned receive buffers. It would require us to make us have to bump up our allocation size by NET_SKB_PAD plus skb_shared_info which would likely force us up to order 1 pages on most platforms. Thanks, Alex