From: Dave Jones <hidden> Date: 2012-03-19 22:40:14
- Given this can be called by any user, prevent them from flooding
the logs by using printk_ratelimited
- Also add a rds: prefix, so it's clear where the message is coming from.
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <redacted>
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Date: 2012-03-19 22:43:40
From: Dave Jones <redacted>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 18:40:09 -0400
- Given this can be called by any user, prevent them from flooding
the logs by using printk_ratelimited
- Also add a rds: prefix, so it's clear where the message is coming from.
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <redacted>
I think it should be removed entirely, no socket layer outputs
a message for this error and neither should rds.
From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Date: 2012-03-19 23:08:27
On Mon, 2012-03-19 at 18:40 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
quoted hunk
- Given this can be called by any user, prevent them from flooding
the logs by using printk_ratelimited
- Also add a rds: prefix, so it's clear where the message is coming from.
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <redacted>
From: Dave Jones<redacted>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 18:40:09 -0400
quoted
- Given this can be called by any user, prevent them from flooding
the logs by using printk_ratelimited
- Also add a rds: prefix, so it's clear where the message is coming from.
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones<redacted>
I think it should be removed entirely, no socket layer outputs
a message for this error and neither should rds.
Agree, the message could be removed entirely.
Venkat