Re: [PATCH 4/6] netprio_cgroup: use IS_ENABLED() and family

[PATCH 1/6] netprio_cgroup: fix an off-by-one bug · Li Zefan <hidden> · 2012-02-01
[PATCH 2/6] netprio_cgroup: don't allocate prio table when a device is registered · Li Zefan <hidden> · 2012-02-01
[PATCH 3/6] netprio_cgroup: fix wrong memory access when NETPRIO_CGROUP=m · Li Zefan <hidden> · 2012-02-01
[PATCH 4/6] netprio_cgroup: use IS_ENABLED() and family · Li Zefan <hidden> · 2012-02-01
Re: [PATCH 4/6] netprio_cgroup: use IS_ENABLED() and family · David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> · 2012-02-01
Re: [PATCH 4/6] netprio_cgroup: use IS_ENABLED() and family · Li Zefan <hidden> · 2012-02-01
Re: [PATCH 4/6] netprio_cgroup: use IS_ENABLED() and family · David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> · 2012-02-01
Re: [PATCH 4/6] netprio_cgroup: use IS_ENABLED() and family · Li Zefan <hidden> · 2012-02-01
Re: [PATCH 4/6] netprio_cgroup: use IS_ENABLED() and family · Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com> · 2012-02-01
[PATCH 5/6] cls_cgroup: use IS_ENABLED() and family · Li Zefan <hidden> · 2012-02-01
[PATCH 6/6] cls_cgroup: remove redundant rcu_read_lock/unlock · Li Zefan <hidden> · 2012-02-01
Re: [PATCH 6/6] cls_cgroup: remove redundant rcu_read_lock/unlock · Eric Dumazet <hidden> · 2012-02-01
Re: [PATCH 6/6] cls_cgroup: remove redundant rcu_read_lock/unlock · David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> · 2012-02-01
Re: [PATCH 6/6] cls_cgroup: remove redundant rcu_read_lock/unlock · Li Zefan <hidden> · 2012-02-01
Re: [PATCH 6/6] cls_cgroup: remove redundant rcu_read_lock/unlock · Herbert Xu <hidden> · 2012-02-01

From: David Miller <hidden>
Date: 2012-02-01 07:01:14
Also in: cgroups, lkml

Do not mix genuine bug fixes and cleanups.

Otherwise I cannot apply your bug fixes to the 'net' tree.

Seperate things out, submit only pure bug fixes first, then
later once those changes propagate you can submit the cleanups.

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help