Re: Linux 3.1-rc9
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: 2011-11-02 17:46:50
Also in:
lkml
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2011-10-25 · Re: Linux 3.1-rc9 · David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
- 2011-10-25 · Re: Linux 3.1-rc9 · Thomas Gleixner <hidden>
- 2011-10-25 · Re: Linux 3.1-rc9 · David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
- 2011-10-25 · Re: Linux 3.1-rc9 · Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
- 2011-10-18 · Re: Linux 3.1-rc9 · Simon Kirby <hidden>
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 10:27 AM, Eric Dumazet [off-list ref] wrote:
I believe it might come from commit 0e734419 (ipv4: Use inet_csk_route_child_sock() in DCCP and TCP.) In case inet_csk_route_child_sock() returns NULL, we dont release socket lock.
Hmm. I'm not seeing it. We're not even taking the socket lock there.
Or is it hidden somehow?
Linus