Re: big picture UDP/IP performance question re 2.6.18 -> 2.6.32

2 messages, 2 authors, 2011-10-04 · open the first message on its own page

Re: big picture UDP/IP performance question re 2.6.18 -> 2.6.32

From: Serge Belyshev <hidden>
Date: 2011-10-04 20:19:25

Christoph Lameter [off-list ref] writes:
No. BFS has no NUMA support.
BFS has NUMA support since v0.300, 1st oct. 2009.

Re: big picture UDP/IP performance question re 2.6.18 -> 2.6.32

From: Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>
Date: 2011-10-04 20:03:44

On Tue, 4 Oct 2011, Serge Belyshev wrote:
Christoph Lameter [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
No. BFS has no NUMA support.
BFS has NUMA support since v0.300, 1st oct. 2009.
From the BFS FAQ (lack of NUMA support causes additional memory latencies,
the high end business server these days have NUMA):

NUMA aware?

It is NOT NUMA aware in the sense that it does any fancy shit on NUMA, but
it will work on NUMA hardware just fine. Only the really big NUMA hardware
is likely to suffer in performance, and this is theoretically only, since
no one has that sort of hardware to prove it to me, but it seems almost
certain. v0.300 onwards have NUMA enhancements.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help