moving GIT back to kernel.org...

8 messages, 4 authors, 2011-10-08 · open the first message on its own page

moving GIT back to kernel.org...

From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2011-10-07 18:57:03

I'm about to setup my GIT trees on kernel.org, once that is complete
I will be solely updating those trees again.

I will notify everyone when this is ready to go.

Just a heads up for everyone...

Re: moving GIT back to kernel.org...

From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2011-10-07 19:59:02

From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2011 14:57:03 -0400 (EDT)
I'm about to setup my GIT trees on kernel.org, once that is complete
I will be solely updating those trees again.

I will notify everyone when this is ready to go.

Just a heads up for everyone...
Ok, they are now online, please update your URLs.

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net.git
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net-next.git
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/sparc.git
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/ide.git

Thanks.

Re: moving GIT back to kernel.org...

From: Stephen Rothwell <hidden>
Date: 2011-10-07 22:42:12

Hi Dave,

On Fri, 07 Oct 2011 15:59:02 -0400 (EDT) David Miller [off-list ref] wrote:
Ok, they are now online, please update your URLs.

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net.git
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net-next.git
I have switched to these.
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/sparc.git
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/ide.git
You used to have sparc-next and ide-next (and the above used to be your
"current release fixes" trees) ...

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Re: moving GIT back to kernel.org...

From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2011-10-07 22:46:57

From: Stephen Rothwell <redacted>
Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2011 09:42:12 +1100
On Fri, 07 Oct 2011 15:59:02 -0400 (EDT) David Miller [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/sparc.git
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/ide.git
You used to have sparc-next and ide-next (and the above used to be your
"current release fixes" trees) ...
I've made a dummy sparc-next tree for you to pull from, thanks:

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/sparc-next.git

As for ide, I only plan to accept real bug fixes for that subsystem
so I'll avoid creating an ide-next tree for now.

Re: moving GIT back to kernel.org...

From: Stephen Rothwell <hidden>
Date: 2011-10-07 23:10:18

Hi Dave,

On Fri, 07 Oct 2011 18:46:57 -0400 (EDT) David Miller [off-list ref] wrote:
From: Stephen Rothwell <redacted>
Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2011 09:42:12 +1100
quoted
On Fri, 07 Oct 2011 15:59:02 -0400 (EDT) David Miller [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/sparc.git
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/ide.git
You used to have sparc-next and ide-next (and the above used to be your
"current release fixes" trees) ...
I've made a dummy sparc-next tree for you to pull from, thanks:

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/sparc-next.git

As for ide, I only plan to accept real bug fixes for that subsystem
so I'll avoid creating an ide-next tree for now.
OK, I will use those trees from now on.

Also, I have decided to rename them in linux-next to match your names, so:

Was		Now
---		---
net-current	net
net		net-next
sparc-current	sparc
sparc		sparc-next
ide-curent	ide

and I have dropped the old ide (would be ide-next) tree.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Re: moving GIT back to kernel.org...

From: Yinglin Sun <hidden>
Date: 2011-10-08 06:55:31

On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 12:59 PM, David Miller [off-list ref] wrote:
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2011 14:57:03 -0400 (EDT)
quoted
I'm about to setup my GIT trees on kernel.org, once that is complete
I will be solely updating those trees again.

I will notify everyone when this is ready to go.

Just a heads up for everyone...
Ok, they are now online, please update your URLs.

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net.git
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net-next.git
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/sparc.git
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/ide.git
I'm still new to net kernel development, so a little confused about these trees.
So we should submit patches based on these trees, instead of Linus'?
About net and net-next, How to decide which one to use?

Thanks!

Yinglin

Re: moving GIT back to kernel.org...

From: Jeff Kirsher <hidden>
Date: 2011-10-08 07:01:35

On 10/07/2011 11:55 PM, Yinglin Sun wrote:
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 12:59 PM, David Miller [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2011 14:57:03 -0400 (EDT)
quoted
I'm about to setup my GIT trees on kernel.org, once that is complete
I will be solely updating those trees again.

I will notify everyone when this is ready to go.

Just a heads up for everyone...
Ok, they are now online, please update your URLs.

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net.git
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net-next.git
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/sparc.git
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/ide.git
I'm still new to net kernel development, so a little confused about these trees.
So we should submit patches based on these trees, instead of Linus'?
About net and net-next, How to decide which one to use?

Thanks!

Yinglin
*If* you have change against the network core/drivers then, you would
want to use David Miller's net or net-next trees.

As a general rule:
 - net tree is only for fixes/critical fixes
 - net-next tree is for everything else

There are always exceptions, but if you stick to the above general rule,
you will be fine.

Re: moving GIT back to kernel.org...

From: Yinglin Sun <hidden>
Date: 2011-10-08 07:09:26

On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 12:01 AM, Jeff Kirsher [off-list ref] wrote:
On 10/07/2011 11:55 PM, Yinglin Sun wrote:
quoted
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 12:59 PM, David Miller [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2011 14:57:03 -0400 (EDT)
quoted
I'm about to setup my GIT trees on kernel.org, once that is complete
I will be solely updating those trees again.

I will notify everyone when this is ready to go.

Just a heads up for everyone...
Ok, they are now online, please update your URLs.

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net.git
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net-next.git
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/sparc.git
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/ide.git
I'm still new to net kernel development, so a little confused about these trees.
So we should submit patches based on these trees, instead of Linus'?
About net and net-next, How to decide which one to use?

Thanks!

Yinglin
*If* you have change against the network core/drivers then, you would
want to use David Miller's net or net-next trees.

As a general rule:
 - net tree is only for fixes/critical fixes
 - net-next tree is for everything else

There are always exceptions, but if you stick to the above general rule,
you will be fine.
Got it. Thanks Jeff!

Yinglin
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help