3 messages, 2 authors, 2011-09-25 · open the first message on its own page
From: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
Date: 2011-09-25 01:13:47
Hi Julian, I am wondering if you have any interest in/objections to trying to merge your forward shared patch which allows an IPVS director to act as a router for realservers using the direct routing or tunnelling forwarding mechanisms. http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/#lvsgw
From: Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>
Date: 2011-09-25 08:39:21
Hello, On Sun, 25 Sep 2011, Simon Horman wrote:
Hi Julian, I am wondering if you have any interest in/objections to trying to merge your forward shared patch which allows an IPVS director to act as a router for realservers using the direct routing or tunnelling forwarding mechanisms. http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/#lvsgw
Such feature is already added to 2.6.33: /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/*/accept_local Regards -- Julian Anastasov [off-list ref]
From: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
Date: 2011-09-25 23:00:51
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 11:39:21AM +0300, Julian Anastasov wrote:
Hello, On Sun, 25 Sep 2011, Simon Horman wrote:quoted
Hi Julian, I am wondering if you have any interest in/objections to trying to merge your forward shared patch which allows an IPVS director to act as a router for realservers using the direct routing or tunnelling forwarding mechanisms. http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/#lvsgwSuch feature is already added to 2.6.33: /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/*/accept_local
Oh, great. Sorry for the noise.