# Re: \[PATCH 5/5\] \[powerpc\] Fix up fsl-flexcan device tree binding.

- From: Scott Wood \<hidden\>
- Date: 2011-08-09 20:11:25 
- List: netdev
- Page: https://ratatoskr.run/netdev/2011/08/8054033
- Thread: https://ratatoskr.run/netdev/2011/08/8054029/t.md

```text
On 08/09/2011 02:32 PM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> On 08/09/2011 08:17 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
>> On 08/09/2011 09:43 AM, Robin Holt wrote:
>>> In working with the socketcan developers, we have come to the conclusion
>>> the fsl-flexcan device tree bindings need to be cleaned up. 
>>> The driver does not depend upon any properties other than the required properties
>>> so we are removing the file.
>>
>> That is not the criterion for whether something should be expresed in
>> the device tree.  It's a description of the hardware, not a Linux driver
>> configuration file.  If there are integration parameters that can not be
>> inferred from "this is FSL flexcan v1.0", they should be expressed in
>> the node.
>>
>> Removing the binding altogether seems extreme as well -- we should have
>> bindings for all devices, even if there are no special properties.
> 
> Yes, of course. The commit message misleading. We do not intend to
> remove the binding but just a few unused and confusing properties.

Is it a matter of the current driver not caring, or the properties just
not making sense for any reasonable driver (ambiguous, inferrable from
the flexcan version, software configuration, etc)?

-Scott

```