Re: [RFC 5/5] [powerpc] Implement a p1010rdb clock source.

2 messages, 2 authors, 2011-08-09 · open the first message on its own page

Re: [RFC 5/5] [powerpc] Implement a p1010rdb clock source.

From: Marc Kleine-Budde <hidden>
Date: 2011-08-08 18:53:11

On 08/08/2011 05:33 PM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
quoted
ACK - The device tree bindings as in mainline's Documentation is a mess.
If the powerpc guys are happy with a clock interfaces based approach
somewhere in arch/ppc, I'm more than happy to remove:
- fsl,flexcan-clock-source (not implemented, even in the fsl driver)

- fsl,flexcan-clock-divider \__ replace with code in arch/ppc, or
- clock-frequency           /   a single clock-frequency attribute
In the "net-next-2.6" tree there is also:

 $ grep flexcan arch/powerpc/boots/dts/*.dts
  p1010rdb.dts:			fsl,flexcan-clock-source = "platform";
  p1010rdb.dts:			fsl,flexcan-clock-source = "platform";
  p1010si.dtsi:			compatible = "fsl,flexcan-v1.0";
  p1010si.dtsi:			fsl,flexcan-clock-divider = <2>;
  p1010si.dtsi:			compatible = "fsl,flexcan-v1.0";
  p1010si.dtsi:			fsl,flexcan-clock-divider = <2>;

Especially the fsl,flexcan-clock-divider = <2>; might make people think,
that they could set something else.
ARGH... :D

Marc

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                  | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
Industrial Linux Solutions        | Phone: +49-231-2826-924     |
Vertretung West/Dortmund          | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686  | http://www.pengutronix.de   |

RE: [RFC 5/5] [powerpc] Implement a p1010rdb clock source.

From: U Bhaskar-B22300 <hidden>
Date: 2011-08-09 07:58:25

-----Original Message-----
From: Marc Kleine-Budde [mailto:mkl@pengutronix.de]
Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2011 12:23 AM
To: Wolfgang Grandegger
Cc: socketcan-core@lists.berlios.de; netdev@vger.kernel.org; U Bhaskar-
B22300
Subject: Re: [RFC 5/5] [powerpc] Implement a p1010rdb clock source.

On 08/08/2011 05:33 PM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
quoted
quoted
ACK - The device tree bindings as in mainline's Documentation is a
mess.
quoted
quoted
If the powerpc guys are happy with a clock interfaces based approach
somewhere in arch/ppc, I'm more than happy to remove:
- fsl,flexcan-clock-source (not implemented, even in the fsl driver)
[Bhaskar]I have pushed the FlexCAN series of patches, It contains the usage of all the fields posted in the FlexCAN bindings at
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-3.0.y.git;a=blob;f=Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/fsl-flexcan.txt;h=1a729f089866259ef82d0db5893ff7a8c54d5ccf;hb=94ed5b4788a7cdbe68bc7cb8516972cbebdc8274  
quoted
quoted
- fsl,flexcan-clock-divider \__ replace with code in arch/ppc, or
- clock-frequency           /   a single clock-frequency attribute
In the "net-next-2.6" tree there is also:

 $ grep flexcan arch/powerpc/boots/dts/*.dts
  p1010rdb.dts:			fsl,flexcan-clock-source = "platform";
  p1010rdb.dts:			fsl,flexcan-clock-source = "platform";
  p1010si.dtsi:			compatible = "fsl,flexcan-v1.0";
  p1010si.dtsi:			fsl,flexcan-clock-divider = <2>;
  p1010si.dtsi:			compatible = "fsl,flexcan-v1.0";
  p1010si.dtsi:			fsl,flexcan-clock-divider = <2>;

Especially the fsl,flexcan-clock-divider = <2>; might make people
think, that they could set something else.
[Bhaskar] As it is mentioned in the Flexcan bindings, the need of fsl,flexcan-clock-divider = <2>;
	    But I kept it as "2" because FlexCan clock source is the platform clock and it is CCB/2
	    If the "2" is misleading, the bindings can be changed or some text can be written to make the meaning of "2"
          Understandable , Please suggest ..  
 

 
ARGH... :D

Marc

--
Pengutronix e.K.                  | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
Industrial Linux Solutions        | Phone: +49-231-2826-924     |
Vertretung West/Dortmund          | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686  | http://www.pengutronix.de   |

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help