Thread (12 messages) 12 messages, 4 authors, 2011-06-28

Re: what's causing "ip_rt_bug"?

From: Tomasz Chmielewski <hidden>
Date: 2011-06-28 08:30:36

On 28.06.2011 05:55, David Miller wrote:
quoted
	The resulting handling should be:

- REJECT TCP:
	- in INPUT we can provide addr_type = RTN_LOCAL but
	better allow rejecting traffic delivered with
	local route (no IP address =>  use RTN_UNSPEC to
	allow also RTN_UNICAST).
	- FORWARD: RTN_UNSPEC =>  allow RTN_LOCAL/RTN_UNICAST
	saddr, add fix to ignore RTN_BROADCAST and RTN_MULTICAST
	- OUTPUT: RTN_UNSPEC

- NAT, mangle, ip_queue, nf_ip_reroute: RTN_UNSPEC in LOCAL_OUT

- IPVS:
	- use RTN_LOCAL in LOCAL_OUT and FORWARD after SNAT
	to restrict saddr to be local

Signed-off-by: Julian Anastasov<ja@ssi.bg>
Unless someone gives some negative feedback soon I'm going to
apply this.
Can you tell me where it will be pushed?

I.e. 3.x kernels only, or does it have a chance to go into 2.6.39.x?


-- 
Tomasz Chmielewski
http://wpkg.org
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help