[PATCH] sctp compilation failed due to lack of sctp_local_addr_free

---
 net/sctp/bind_addr.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/sctp/bind_addr.c b/net/sctp/bind_addr.c
index 6338413..83e3011 100644
--- a/net/sctp/bind_addr.c
+++ b/net/sctp/bind_addr.c

@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ static void sctp_bind_addr_clean(struct sctp_bind_addr *bp)
 	/* Empty the bind address list. */
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(addr, temp, &bp->address_list, list) {
 		list_del_rcu(&addr->list);
-		call_rcu(&addr->rcu, sctp_local_addr_free);
+		kfree_rcu(addr, rcu);
 		SCTP_DBG_OBJCNT_DEC(addr);
 	}
 }

-- 
1.7.2.2

On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 09:28 -0700, Dmitry Kravkov wrote:

---
 net/sctp/bind_addr.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

It was easier to fix it like commit
1231f0baa547a541a7481119323b7f964dda4788 does, than to disable it in
kernel config :)

This has been fixed for days.

-----Original Message-----
From: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org] On
Behalf Of David Miller
Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2011 10:39 AM
To: dmitry@broadcom.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org; difrost.kernel@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sctp compilation failed due to lack of sctp_local_addr_free


This has been fixed for days.

Fixed in net-2.6, yes, but not yet in net-next-2.6

From: "Allan, Bruce W" <redacted>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 11:40:34 -0700

quoted

-----Original Message-----
From: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org] On
Behalf Of David Miller
Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2011 10:39 AM
To: dmitry@broadcom.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org; difrost.kernel@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sctp compilation failed due to lack of sctp_local_addr_free


This has been fixed for days.

Fixed in net-2.6, yes, but not yet in net-next-2.6

net-next-2.6 is not active and is just a dummy tree for Stephen
Rothwell to pull into -next

You should never be referencing or using net-next-2.6 during the
merge window when new features changes are not being accepted.
Only net-2.6 is active during this time.

On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 11:44 -0700, David Miller wrote:

From: "Allan, Bruce W" <redacted>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 11:40:34 -0700

quoted

quoted

-----Original Message-----
From: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org] On
Behalf Of David Miller
Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2011 10:39 AM
To: dmitry@broadcom.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org; difrost.kernel@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sctp compilation failed due to lack of sctp_local_addr_free


This has been fixed for days.

Fixed in net-2.6, yes, but not yet in net-next-2.6

net-next-2.6 is not active and is just a dummy tree for Stephen
Rothwell to pull into -next

You should never be referencing or using net-next-2.6 during the
merge window when new features changes are not being accepted.
Only net-2.6 is active during this time.

Hmm, so how similar will be net-2.6 and net-next-2.6 when re-opened?
You apply a lot of fixes during this time...

And yes, i've hit the compilation error in net-next since i'm using it
as basis for future features submit

From: "Dmitry Kravkov" <redacted>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 22:07:01 +0300

On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 11:44 -0700, David Miller wrote:

quoted

From: "Allan, Bruce W" <redacted>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 11:40:34 -0700

quoted

quoted

-----Original Message-----
From: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org] On
Behalf Of David Miller
Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2011 10:39 AM
To: dmitry@broadcom.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org; difrost.kernel@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sctp compilation failed due to lack of sctp_local_addr_free


This has been fixed for days.

Fixed in net-2.6, yes, but not yet in net-next-2.6

net-next-2.6 is not active and is just a dummy tree for Stephen
Rothwell to pull into -next

You should never be referencing or using net-next-2.6 during the
merge window when new features changes are not being accepted.
Only net-2.6 is active during this time.

Hmm, so how similar will be net-2.6 and net-next-2.6 when re-opened?
You apply a lot of fixes during this time...

When it opens up I just update net-next-2.6 to whatever is in net-2.6
at the time.