On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Hefty, Sean [off-list ref] wrote:
One of the patches in the af_ib patch set adds the qp_type to struct rdma_cm_id. I'm guessing that patch will also be needed for xrc.
Would it make sense to pull that patch at least in?
Sorry I haven't had time to really think about AF_IB in general but
maybe I can at least merge the netlink stuff this cycle?
- R.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 11:49 AM, Roland Dreier [off-list ref] wrote:
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Hefty, Sean [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
One of the patches in the af_ib patch set adds the qp_type to struct rdma_cm_id. I'm guessing that patch will also be needed for xrc.
Would it make sense to pull that patch at least in?
Sorry I haven't had time to really think about AF_IB in general but
maybe I can at least merge the netlink stuff this cycle?
And actually looking at https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/90204/
it looks reasonable to merge now... or I could just use
cma_is_ud_ps() in the netlink stuff.
I'm inclined to just take your patch now if that makes sense to you
(it looks pretty independent of everything else)
Is that the latest version in patchwork?
Thanks,
- R.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html