From: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl> Date: 2011-03-31 09:58:12
dev_ethtool_get_rx_csum() won't report rx checksumming when it's not
changeable and driver is converted to hw_features and friends. Fix this.
(dev->hw_features & NETIF_F_RXCSUM) check is dropped - if the
ethtool_ops->get_rx_csum is set, then driver is not coverted, yet.
Signed-off-by: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl>
---
[this is a fix also for 2.6.39]
include/linux/netdevice.h | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Date: 2011-04-02 03:24:15
From: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 11:58:08 +0200 (CEST)
dev_ethtool_get_rx_csum() won't report rx checksumming when it's not
changeable and driver is converted to hw_features and friends. Fix this.
(dev->hw_features & NETIF_F_RXCSUM) check is dropped - if the
ethtool_ops->get_rx_csum is set, then driver is not coverted, yet.
Signed-off-by: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl>
From: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl> Date: 2011-04-04 14:14:45
On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 08:23:35PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
From: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 11:58:08 +0200 (CEST)
quoted
dev_ethtool_get_rx_csum() won't report rx checksumming when it's not
changeable and driver is converted to hw_features and friends. Fix this.
(dev->hw_features & NETIF_F_RXCSUM) check is dropped - if the
ethtool_ops->get_rx_csum is set, then driver is not coverted, yet.
Signed-off-by: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl>
Applied, thanks.
I noticed this didn't get into your net-next tree (it's only in net).
This impacts the hw_features conversions that are in net-next.
BTW, what's the policy for this kind of patches? I send them relative
to net-next normally and note if this is also for -rc/stable - is this
The Good Way(tm)?
Best Regards,
Michał Mirosław
From: Ben Hutchings <hidden> Date: 2011-04-04 14:54:43
On Mon, 2011-04-04 at 16:14 +0200, Michał Mirosław wrote:
On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 08:23:35PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
quoted
From: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 11:58:08 +0200 (CEST)
quoted
dev_ethtool_get_rx_csum() won't report rx checksumming when it's not
changeable and driver is converted to hw_features and friends. Fix this.
(dev->hw_features & NETIF_F_RXCSUM) check is dropped - if the
ethtool_ops->get_rx_csum is set, then driver is not coverted, yet.
Signed-off-by: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl>
Applied, thanks.
I noticed this didn't get into your net-next tree (it's only in net).
This impacts the hw_features conversions that are in net-next.
BTW, what's the policy for this kind of patches? I send them relative
to net-next normally and note if this is also for -rc/stable - is this
The Good Way(tm)?
If you want a change to be included in the upcoming release, it must be
applied initially to net-2.6; therefore it must be based on net-2.6.
David will periodically merge net-2.6 into net-next-2.6. You can
probably do a test merge yourself if you want to see what the result
will be.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
On Mon, 2011-04-04 at 16:14 +0200, Michał Mirosław wrote:
quoted
On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 08:23:35PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
quoted
From: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 11:58:08 +0200 (CEST)
quoted
dev_ethtool_get_rx_csum() won't report rx checksumming when it's not
changeable and driver is converted to hw_features and friends. Fix this.
(dev->hw_features & NETIF_F_RXCSUM) check is dropped - if the
ethtool_ops->get_rx_csum is set, then driver is not coverted, yet.
Signed-off-by: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl>
Applied, thanks.
I noticed this didn't get into your net-next tree (it's only in net).
This impacts the hw_features conversions that are in net-next.
BTW, what's the policy for this kind of patches? I send them relative
to net-next normally and note if this is also for -rc/stable - is this
The Good Way(tm)?
If you want a change to be included in the upcoming release, it must be
applied initially to net-2.6; therefore it must be based on net-2.6.
David will periodically merge net-2.6 into net-next-2.6. You can
probably do a test merge yourself if you want to see what the result
will be.
I've just merged net-2.6 into net-next-2.6, so anything which exists in
net-2.6 will show up in net-next-2.6 now too.