[PATCH net-next 0/11] tg3: 5719, VLAN, and EEE bugfixes
From: Matt Carlson <hidden>
Date: 2011-01-26 01:59:19
This patchset implements bugfixes for the 5719, the VLAN code and enhances EEE support.
5 messages, 3 authors, 2011-01-26 · open the first message on its own page
From: Matt Carlson <hidden>
Date: 2011-01-26 01:59:19
This patchset implements bugfixes for the 5719, the VLAN code and enhances EEE support.
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2011-01-26 03:38:24
From: "Matt Carlson" <redacted> Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 17:58:46 -0800
This patchset implements bugfixes for the 5719, the VLAN code and enhances EEE support.
All applied to net-next-2.6, thanks. In particular, thanks for taking care of the vlan conversion.
From: Eric Dumazet <hidden>
Date: 2011-01-26 06:14:44
Le mardi 25 janvier 2011 à 19:38 -0800, David Miller a écrit :
From: "Matt Carlson" <redacted> Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 17:58:46 -0800quoted
This patchset implements bugfixes for the 5719, the VLAN code and enhances EEE support.All applied to net-next-2.6, thanks. In particular, thanks for taking care of the vlan conversion. --
I tested the vlan patch on my machine, and it solves the problem I had with linux-2.6 I believe this particular patch should be net-2.6 material, not net-next-2.6 (There is a small rejected hunk) Thanks !
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2011-01-26 06:26:59
From: Eric Dumazet <redacted> Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 07:14:37 +0100
I tested the vlan patch on my machine, and it solves the problem I had with linux-2.6 I believe this particular patch should be net-2.6 material, not net-next-2.6
Agreed.
(There is a small rejected hunk)
Matt, if you would send me a net-2.6 backport with your blessing I'd appreciate it.
From: Matt Carlson <hidden>
Date: 2011-01-26 20:01:39
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 10:27:34PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
From: Eric Dumazet <redacted> Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 07:14:37 +0100quoted
I tested the vlan patch on my machine, and it solves the problem I had with linux-2.6 I believe this particular patch should be net-2.6 material, not net-next-2.6Agreed.quoted
(There is a small rejected hunk)Matt, if you would send me a net-2.6 backport with your blessing I'd appreciate it.
Sure. Coming right up.