Re: [PATCH 1/4] RxRPC: Declare the security index constants symbolically
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2009-09-15 09:45:55
All 4 patches applied, but... The rxrpc code seems to use a hodge-podge of uint32_t, uint16_t et al. and the Linux kernel preferred "u8". Please consolidate it all to use u32, u16, etc. This looks especially weird since you use the endianness aware fixed sized Linux types (be32, be16) as well.