Thread (19 messages) 19 messages, 3 authors, 2009-06-10

Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6 1/1] e1000e: Expose MDI-X status via ethtool change

From: Chaitanya Lala <hidden>
Date: 2009-06-03 21:41:07

Jeff Kirsher wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Chaitanya Lala [off-list ref] wrote:
  
quoted
Jeff Kirsher wrote:
    
quoted
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:45 AM, Chaitanya Lala [off-list ref]
wrote:

      
quoted
Ben Hutchings wrote:

        
quoted
On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 16:15 -0700, Chaitanya Lala wrote:
[...]


          
quoted
diff --git a/include/linux/ethtool.h b/include/linux/ethtool.h
index 380b042..b553bdb 100644
--- a/include/linux/ethtool.h
+++ b/include/linux/ethtool.h
@@ -30,7 +30,8 @@ struct ethtool_cmd {
      __u32   maxtxpkt;       /* Tx pkts before generating tx int */
      __u32   maxrxpkt;       /* Rx pkts before generating rx int */
      __u16   speed_hi;
-       __u16   reserved2;
+       __u8    is_mdix;


            
Since this is specific to Ethernet over twisted-pair cable, could you
please rename this to "eth_tp_mdix".


          
Will do for sure.

        
quoted
          
quoted
+       __u8    reserved2;
      __u32   lp_advertising; /* Features the link partner advertises
*/
      __u32   reserved[2];
 };
@@ -632,6 +633,11 @@ struct ethtool_ops {
 #define AUTONEG_DISABLE                0x00
 #define AUTONEG_ENABLE         0x01
 +/* Mode MDI or MDI-X */
+#define MDI_INVALID 0x00
+#define MDI         0x01
+#define MDI_X       0x02


            
[...]

Similarly, please add the prefix "ETH_TP_" to these.


          
Sure.

        
Chaitanya, I have made the requested changes to the patch in my tree.


      
Thanks. I am very new to procedure of submitting kernel patches. Just want
to make sure if this means that I not need to send another patch to netdev ?

Thanks,
Chaitanya
--
    
When there are changes requested on a patch, yes the patch needs to be
re-submitted to netdev.  Since I will be pushing this patch along with
other patches for Intel drivers to Dave once testing has been
completed, there is no need for you to re-submit this patch.  I have
already sucked in the changes that Ben has requested into the patch
that is in my tree.

  
Thanks for the clarification.

Chaitanya
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help