Question about supporting non-IP offloads (FCoE)
From: Chris Leech <hidden>
Date: 2008-09-24 20:55:27
I'm looking at adding support for stateless offloads to the Fibre Channel over Ethernet stack at open-fcoe.org that roughly match currently supported TCP offloads: Fibre Channel CRC offload on Tx and Rx, and sequencing offload (GSO) on Tx.
From the net_device all I see the need for is two feature flags bits for
the transmit path, one for FC-CRC and one for FCoE GSO. In the skb, the FCoE needs match up well with the existing CRC and GSO fields. I would like to reuse the ip_summed bits rather than add to the skb, but I suspect this will be the most controversial part of the FCoE offloads. Are there any objections to the idea of adding checks for FCoE protocol to the dev_queue_xmit/dev_can_checksum/can_checksum_protocol path? Obviously skb_checksum_help isn't going to work as a software fallback and a protocol check would need to be added there as well, or a per-protocol helper like is done for gso_segment. - Chris