Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/1] cxgb3i: cxgb3 iSCSI initiator

2 messages, 2 authors, 2008-08-11 · open the first message on its own page

Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/1] cxgb3i: cxgb3 iSCSI initiator

From: Roland Dreier <hidden>
Date: 2008-08-11 21:40:04

 > > Yes, that's the question -- are stateless offloads (plus CRC32C in the
 > > CPU etc) going to give good enough performance that the whole TCP
 > > offload exercise is pointless?
 > 
 > This is by definition true, over time.  And this has stedfastly proven
 > itself, over and over again.

By the definition of what?

 - R.

Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/1] cxgb3i: cxgb3 iSCSI initiator

From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2008-08-11 21:52:27

From: Roland Dreier <redacted>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 14:39:47 -0700
 > > Yes, that's the question -- are stateless offloads (plus CRC32C in the
 > > CPU etc) going to give good enough performance that the whole TCP
 > > offload exercise is pointless?
 > 
 > This is by definition true, over time.  And this has stedfastly proven
 > itself, over and over again.

By the definition of what?
By definition of time always advancing forward, and cpus always
getting faster, and memory (albeit more slowly) increasing in
speed too,
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help