(please do not remove the netdev Cc:)
Francois Romieu [off-list ref] :
[...]
If it does not work I'll dissect 0e4851502f846b13b29b7f88f1250c980d57e944
tomorrow.
You will find a tgz archive in attachment which contains a serie of patches
(0001-... to 0005-...) to walk from 6dccd16b7c2703e8bbf8bca62b5cf248332afbe2
to 0e4851502f846b13b29b7f88f1250c980d57e944 in smaller steps.
Please apply 0001 on top of 6dccd16b7c2703e8bbf8bca62b5cf248332afbe2. If it
still works, apply 0002 on top of 0001, etc.
--
Ueimor
From: Karl Meyer <hidden> Date: 2007-08-16 21:03:54
I did some testing today and found that the error occurs after
applying some of the patches. However I did not figure out the exact
patch in which the error "starts" since it sometimes occurs immediatly
when moving some data over the net and sometimes it takes 30 min till
I get the transmit timeout. I will be away till sunday and do some
more testing then.
2007/8/16, Francois Romieu [off-list ref]:
(please do not remove the netdev Cc:)
Francois Romieu [off-list ref] :
[...]
quoted
If it does not work I'll dissect 0e4851502f846b13b29b7f88f1250c980d57e944
tomorrow.
You will find a tgz archive in attachment which contains a serie of patches
(0001-... to 0005-...) to walk from 6dccd16b7c2703e8bbf8bca62b5cf248332afbe2
to 0e4851502f846b13b29b7f88f1250c980d57e944 in smaller steps.
Please apply 0001 on top of 6dccd16b7c2703e8bbf8bca62b5cf248332afbe2. If it
still works, apply 0002 on top of 0001, etc.
--
Ueimor
From: Karl Meyer <hidden> Date: 2007-08-20 09:26:16
The error exists from patch 2 on. I did some network testing with
patch 1 and currently use it and have no errors so far.
From my experiences up to now patch 1 should be error free.
2007/8/16, Francois Romieu [off-list ref]:
(please do not remove the netdev Cc:)
Francois Romieu [off-list ref] :
[...]
quoted
If it does not work I'll dissect 0e4851502f846b13b29b7f88f1250c980d57e944
tomorrow.
You will find a tgz archive in attachment which contains a serie of patches
(0001-... to 0005-...) to walk from 6dccd16b7c2703e8bbf8bca62b5cf248332afbe2
to 0e4851502f846b13b29b7f88f1250c980d57e944 in smaller steps.
Please apply 0001 on top of 6dccd16b7c2703e8bbf8bca62b5cf248332afbe2. If it
still works, apply 0002 on top of 0001, etc.
--
Ueimor
From: Karl Meyer <hidden> Date: 2007-08-21 10:56:24
fyi:
I do not know whether it is related to the problem, but since using
the version you told me there are these entries is my log:
frege Hangcheck: hangcheck value past margin!
frege Hangcheck: hangcheck value past margin!
frege Hangcheck: hangcheck value past margin!
2007/8/16, Francois Romieu [off-list ref]:
(please do not remove the netdev Cc:)
Francois Romieu [off-list ref] :
[...]
quoted
If it does not work I'll dissect 0e4851502f846b13b29b7f88f1250c980d57e944
tomorrow.
You will find a tgz archive in attachment which contains a serie of patches
(0001-... to 0005-...) to walk from 6dccd16b7c2703e8bbf8bca62b5cf248332afbe2
to 0e4851502f846b13b29b7f88f1250c980d57e944 in smaller steps.
Please apply 0001 on top of 6dccd16b7c2703e8bbf8bca62b5cf248332afbe2. If it
still works, apply 0002 on top of 0001, etc.
--
Ueimor
fyi:
I do not know whether it is related to the problem, but since using
the version you told me there are these entries is my log:
frege Hangcheck: hangcheck value past margin!
...
BTW, I don't know wheter it's related too, but I think you should try
first to get rid of these errors:
From: Karl Meyer <hidden> Date: 2007-09-01 19:24:51
This is what happened today:
Sep 1 21:08:01 frege NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out
frege ~ # uname -r
2.6.22.5-cfs-v20.5
2007/8/16, Francois Romieu [off-list ref]:
(please do not remove the netdev Cc:)
Francois Romieu [off-list ref] :
[...]
quoted
If it does not work I'll dissect 0e4851502f846b13b29b7f88f1250c980d57e944
tomorrow.
You will find a tgz archive in attachment which contains a serie of patches
(0001-... to 0005-...) to walk from 6dccd16b7c2703e8bbf8bca62b5cf248332afbe2
to 0e4851502f846b13b29b7f88f1250c980d57e944 in smaller steps.
Please apply 0001 on top of 6dccd16b7c2703e8bbf8bca62b5cf248332afbe2. If it
still works, apply 0002 on top of 0001, etc.
--
Ueimor
From: Karl Meyer <hidden> Date: 2007-09-02 22:22:12
Hi,
am am looking for this issue for some time now, but there where no
errors in 2.6.22-r2 (gentoo speak, I guess this is 2.6.22.2
officially), I also ran git-bisect (for more information see the older
messages in this thread).
2007/9/3, Michal Piotrowski [off-list ref]:
Hi,
On 01/09/07, Karl Meyer [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
This is what happened today:
Sep 1 21:08:01 frege NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out
frege ~ # uname -r
2.6.22.5-cfs-v20.5
am am looking for this issue for some time now, but there where no
errors in 2.6.22-r2 (gentoo speak, I guess this is 2.6.22.2
officially), I also ran git-bisect (for more information see the older
messages in this thread).
2.6.22-r2 in gentoo is based on 2.6.22.1. It is way before
0e4851502f846b13b29b7f88f1250c980d57e944 that you reported to work.
Thus it is not surprizing that it works.
Any update regarding the patchkit that I sent on 2007/08/16 ?
It would help to narrow the culprit.
--
Ueimor
From: Karl Meyer <hidden> Date: 2007-09-26 09:08:14
Hi Francois,
this is what I found and sent:
The error exists from patch 2 on. I did some network testing with
patch 1 and currently use it and have no errors so far.
From my experiences up to now patch 1 should be error free.
Do you need additional info?
2007/9/12, Francois Romieu [off-list ref]:
Karl Meyer [off-list ref] :
[...]
quoted
am am looking for this issue for some time now, but there where no
errors in 2.6.22-r2 (gentoo speak, I guess this is 2.6.22.2
officially), I also ran git-bisect (for more information see the older
messages in this thread).
2.6.22-r2 in gentoo is based on 2.6.22.1. It is way before
0e4851502f846b13b29b7f88f1250c980d57e944 that you reported to work.
Thus it is not surprizing that it works.
Any update regarding the patchkit that I sent on 2007/08/16 ?
It would help to narrow the culprit.
--
Ueimor
From: Karl Meyer <hidden> Date: 2007-10-01 11:42:45
Hi,
after reading about issues with the nics on kontron boards I did a
bios upgrade,
but this did not change anything.
However, yesterday the nic (onboard) I used died. No link at all,
after switching to
the next onboard nic I got a NETDEV transmit timeout with that one on
kernel 2.6.22-r2.
It seems the whole thing is a hardware issue. I will try to figure out
with kontron.
Sorry :(
Karl
2007/9/12, Francois Romieu [off-list ref]:
Karl Meyer [off-list ref] :
[...]
quoted
am am looking for this issue for some time now, but there where no
errors in 2.6.22-r2 (gentoo speak, I guess this is 2.6.22.2
officially), I also ran git-bisect (for more information see the older
messages in this thread).
2.6.22-r2 in gentoo is based on 2.6.22.1. It is way before
0e4851502f846b13b29b7f88f1250c980d57e944 that you reported to work.
Thus it is not surprizing that it works.
Any update regarding the patchkit that I sent on 2007/08/16 ?
It would help to narrow the culprit.
--
Ueimor