Re: [RFC] fib_trie: whitespace cleanup
From: Paul E. McKenney <hidden>
Date: 2007-07-30 17:07:37
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 09:56:30PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 08:44:21 -0700 "Paul E. McKenney" [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 11:49:42AM +0100, Stephen Hemminger wrote:quoted
Whitespace cleanup run code through lindent then cleanup results. Applys after other two patches.--- a/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c 2007-07-26 10:17:21.000000000 +0100 +++ b/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c 2007-07-26 11:47:52.000000000 +0100@@ -156,7 +156,8 @@ struct trie { }; static void put_child(struct trie *t, struct tnode *tn, int i, struct node *n); -static void tnode_put_child_reorg(struct tnode *tn, int i, struct node *n, int wasfull); +static void tnode_put_child_reorg(struct tnode *tn, int i, struct node *n, + int wasfull); static struct node *resize(struct trie *t, struct tnode *tn); static struct tnode *inflate(struct trie *t, struct tnode *tn); static struct tnode *halve(struct trie *t, struct tnode *tn);@@ -167,13 +168,12 @@ static struct trie *trie_local = NULL, * static inline struct tnode *node_parent(struct node *node) { - return rcu_dereference((struct tnode *) (node->parent & ~NODE_TYPE_MASK)); + return rcu_dereference((struct tnode *)(node->parent & ~NODE_TYPE_MASK));The potential issue is applying rcu_dereference() to an rvalue as opposed to an lvalue. So how about the following?I did this: static inline struct tnode *node_parent(struct node *node) { struct tnode *ret; ret = (struct tnode *)(node->parent & ~NODE_TYPE_MASK); return rcu_dereference(ret); }
I would feel more comfortable with the rcu_dereference() covering the initial fetch from node->parent, but do not have any hard objections to your approach. Thanx, Paul