From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Date: 2007-02-15 10:45:15
I've recently been noticing nasty messages come out of FC5:
sony:/home/akpm# service iptables stop
Flushing firewall rules: [ OK ]
Setting chains to policy ACCEPT: filter [ OK ]
Unloading iptables modules: [ OK ]
sony:/home/akpm# service iptables start
Applying iptables firewall rules: iptables-restore: line 20 failed
[FAILED]
Dunno when it started happening, but it's in mainline now.
It's a pretty stupid error message. line 20 of what?
sony:/home/akpm# rpm -q iptables
iptables-1.3.5-1.2
From: Dave Jones <hidden> Date: 2007-02-15 11:20:30
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 02:45:07AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> I've recently been noticing nasty messages come out of FC5:
>
> sony:/home/akpm# service iptables stop
> Flushing firewall rules: [ OK ]
> Setting chains to policy ACCEPT: filter [ OK ]
> Unloading iptables modules: [ OK ]
> sony:/home/akpm# service iptables start
> Applying iptables firewall rules: iptables-restore: line 20 failed
> [FAILED]
>
> Dunno when it started happening, but it's in mainline now.
>
> It's a pretty stupid error message. line 20 of what?
2.6.18 -> 2.6.19 changes a bunch of netfilter config option names.
Sure you weren't bitten by that ?
Dave
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Date: 2007-02-15 11:36:22
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 06:20:22 -0500 Dave Jones [off-list ref] wrote:
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 02:45:07AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> I've recently been noticing nasty messages come out of FC5:
>
> sony:/home/akpm# service iptables stop
> Flushing firewall rules: [ OK ]
> Setting chains to policy ACCEPT: filter [ OK ]
> Unloading iptables modules: [ OK ]
> sony:/home/akpm# service iptables start
> Applying iptables firewall rules: iptables-restore: line 20 failed
> [FAILED]
>
> Dunno when it started happening, but it's in mainline now.
>
> It's a pretty stupid error message. line 20 of what?
2.6.18 -> 2.6.19 changes a bunch of netfilter config option names.
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Date: 2007-02-15 12:10:57
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 06:20:22 -0500 Dave Jones [off-list ref] wrote:
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 02:45:07AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> I've recently been noticing nasty messages come out of FC5:
>
> sony:/home/akpm# service iptables stop
> Flushing firewall rules: [ OK ]
> Setting chains to policy ACCEPT: filter [ OK ]
> Unloading iptables modules: [ OK ]
> sony:/home/akpm# service iptables start
> Applying iptables firewall rules: iptables-restore: line 20 failed
> [FAILED]
>
> Dunno when it started happening, but it's in mainline now.
>
> It's a pretty stupid error message. line 20 of what?
2.6.18 -> 2.6.19 changes a bunch of netfilter config option names.
Sure you weren't bitten by that ?
Yeah, going and madly turning 1000 things on seemed to make it happy.
From: David Hollis <hidden> Date: 2007-02-15 14:04:57
On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 04:10 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 06:20:22 -0500 Dave Jones [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 02:45:07AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> I've recently been noticing nasty messages come out of FC5:
>
> sony:/home/akpm# service iptables stop
> Flushing firewall rules: [ OK ]
> Setting chains to policy ACCEPT: filter [ OK ]
> Unloading iptables modules: [ OK ]
> sony:/home/akpm# service iptables start
> Applying iptables firewall rules: iptables-restore: line 20 failed
> [FAILED]
>
> Dunno when it started happening, but it's in mainline now.
>
> It's a pretty stupid error message. line 20 of what?
2.6.18 -> 2.6.19 changes a bunch of netfilter config option names.
Sure you weren't bitten by that ?
Yeah, going and madly turning 1000 things on seemed to make it happy.
If you ran system-config-securitylevel to do that, that probably made it
re-generate the /etc/sysconfig/iptables file which is dumped to
iptables.
--
David Hollis [off-list ref]