Re: [patch 1/4] - Potential performance bottleneck for Linxu TCP
From: Wenji Wu <hidden>
Date: 2006-11-30 02:02:12
That yield() will need to be removed - yield()'s behaviour is truly awfulif the system is otherwise busy. What is it there for?
Please read the uploaded paper, which has detailed description. thanks, wenji ----- Original Message ----- From: Andrew Morton <redacted> Date: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 7:08 pm Subject: Re: [patch 1/4] - Potential performance bottleneck for Linxu TCP
quoted hunk
On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 16:53:11 -0800 (PST) David Miller [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Please, it is very difficult to review your work the way you have submitted this patch as a set of 4 patches. These patches have not been split up "logically", but rather they have been split up "per file" with the same exact changelog message in each patch posting. This is very clumsy, and impossible to review, and wastes a lot of mailing list bandwith. We have an excellent file, calledDocumentation/SubmittingPatches, inquoted
the kernel source tree, which explains exactly how to do this correctly. By splitting your patch into 4 patches, one for each file touched, it is impossible to review your patch as a logical whole. Please also provide your patch inline so people can just hit reply in their mail reader client to quote your patch and comment on it. This is impossible with the attachments you've used.Here you go - joined up, cleaned up, ported to mainline and test- compiled. That yield() will need to be removed - yield()'s behaviour is truly awfulif the system is otherwise busy. What is it there for? From: Wenji Wu <redacted> For Linux TCP, when the network applcaiton make system call to move data from socket's receive buffer to user space by calling tcp_recvmsg(). The socket will be locked. During this period, all the incoming packet for the TCP socket will go to the backlog queue without being TCP processed Since Linux 2.6 can be inerrupted mid-task, if the network application expires, and moved to the expired array with the socket locked, all thepackets within the backlog queue will not be TCP processed till the network applicaton resume its execution. If the system is heavily loaded, TCP can easily RTO in the Sender Side. include/linux/sched.h | 2 ++ kernel/fork.c | 3 +++ kernel/sched.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++------ net/ipv4/tcp.c | 9 +++++++++ 4 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff -puN net/ipv4/tcp.c~tcp-speedup net/ipv4/tcp.c--- a/net/ipv4/tcp.c~tcp-speedup +++ a/net/ipv4/tcp.c@@ -1109,6 +1109,8 @@ int tcp_recvmsg(struct kiocb *iocb, strustruct task_struct *user_recv = NULL; int copied_early = 0; + current->backlog_flag = 1; + lock_sock(sk); TCP_CHECK_TIMER(sk);@@ -1468,6 +1470,13 @@ skip_copy:TCP_CHECK_TIMER(sk); release_sock(sk); + + current->backlog_flag = 0; + if (current->extrarun_flag == 1){ + current->extrarun_flag = 0; + yield(); + } + return copied; out: diff -puN include/linux/sched.h~tcp-speedup include/linux/sched.h--- a/include/linux/sched.h~tcp-speedup +++ a/include/linux/sched.h@@ -1023,6 +1023,8 @@ struct task_struct {#ifdef CONFIG_TASK_DELAY_ACCT struct task_delay_info *delays; #endif + int backlog_flag; /* packets wait in tcp backlog queue flag */ + int extrarun_flag; /* extra run flag for TCP performance */ }; static inline pid_t process_group(struct task_struct *tsk) diff -puN kernel/sched.c~tcp-speedup kernel/sched.c--- a/kernel/sched.c~tcp-speedup +++ a/kernel/sched.c@@ -3099,12 +3099,24 @@ void scheduler_tick(void) if (!rq->expired_timestamp) rq->expired_timestamp = jiffies; - if (!TASK_INTERACTIVE(p) || expired_starving(rq)) { - enqueue_task(p, rq->expired); - if (p->static_prio < rq->best_expired_prio) - rq->best_expired_prio = p->static_prio; - } else - enqueue_task(p, rq->active); + if (p->backlog_flag == 0) { + if (!TASK_INTERACTIVE(p) || expired_starving(rq)) { + enqueue_task(p, rq->expired); + if (p->static_prio < rq->best_expired_prio) + rq->best_expired_prio = p-quoted
static_prio;+ } else+ enqueue_task(p, rq->active); + } else { + if (expired_starving(rq)) { + enqueue_task(p,rq->expired); + if (p->static_prio < rq->best_expired_prio) + rq->best_expired_prio = p-quoted
static_prio;+ } else {+ if (!TASK_INTERACTIVE(p)) + p->extrarun_flag = 1; + enqueue_task(p,rq->active); + } + } } else { /* * Prevent a too long timeslice allowing a task to monopolizediff -puN kernel/fork.c~tcp-speedup kernel/fork.c--- a/kernel/fork.c~tcp-speedup +++ a/kernel/fork.c@@ -1032,6 +1032,9 @@ static struct task_struct *copy_process(clear_tsk_thread_flag(p, TIF_SIGPENDING); init_sigpending(&p->pending); + p->backlog_flag = 0; + p->extrarun_flag = 0; + p->utime = cputime_zero; p->stime = cputime_zero; p->sched_time = 0; _