RE: [RFC 1/3] secid reconciliation on inbound

On Tue, 1 Aug 2006, James Morris wrote:

quoted

On Tue, 1 Aug 2006, Venkat Yekkirala wrote:

quoted

+#define PACKET__COME_THRU                         0x00000008UL
+#define PACKET__GO_THRU                           0x00000010UL

These names seem awkward, and do we really need a separate 

perm for each 

quoted

direction?

Ok, I see we need separate permissions.  The naming, still...

You are probably seeing something I haven't :), because I did
consider using just one perm such as flow_thru for both directions
but then thought separate perms would make things easier to understand.

As for naming, how about "enter" and "leave"? Or "flow_in" and "flow_out".
Any other suggestions out there?