RE: My vote against eepro* removal
From: kus Kusche Klaus <hidden>
Date: 2006-01-24 07:38:17
Also in:
lkml
From: Jesse Brandeburg
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006, kus Kusche Klaus wrote:quoted
Here are my results: If the watchdog doesn't get interrupted, preempted, or whatever, it spends 340 us in its body: * 303 us in the mii code * 36 us in the following code up to e100_adjust_adaptive_ifs * 1 us in the remaining code (I think my chip doesn't need any of those chip-specific fixups) The 303 us in the mii code are divided in the following way: * 101 us in mii_ethtool_gset * 135 us in the whole if * 67 us in mii_check_link This is with the udelay(2) instead of udelay(20) hack applied. With udelay(20), the mii times are 128 + 170 + 85 us, i.e. 383 us instead of 303 us, or >= 420 us for the whole watchdog.Thank you very much for that detailed analysis! okay, so calls to mii.c take too long, but those depend on mmio_read in e100 to do the work, so this patch attempts to minimize the latency. This patch is against linus-2.6.git, I compile and ssh/ping tested it. Would you be willing to send your instrumentation patches? I could then test any fixes easier.
No deep magic behind my instrumentation:
A few global variables and some rdtscl in the watchdog:
unsigned long my_tsc_1 = 0;
unsigned long my_tsc_2 = 0;
unsigned long my_tsc_3 = 0;
unsigned long my_tsc_4 = 0;
EXPORT_SYMBOL(my_tsc_1);
EXPORT_SYMBOL(my_tsc_2);
EXPORT_SYMBOL(my_tsc_3);
EXPORT_SYMBOL(my_tsc_4);
static void e100_watchdog(unsigned long data)
{
struct nic *nic = (struct nic *)data;
struct ethtool_cmd cmd;
DPRINTK(TIMER, DEBUG, "right now = %ld\n", jiffies);
/* mii library handles link maintenance tasks */
rdtscl(my_tsc_1);
mii_ethtool_gset(&nic->mii, &cmd);
rdtscl(my_tsc_2);
if(mii_link_ok(&nic->mii) && !netif_carrier_ok(nic->netdev)) {
DPRINTK(LINK, INFO, "link up, %sMbps, %s-duplex\n",
cmd.speed == SPEED_100 ? "100" : "10",
cmd.duplex == DUPLEX_FULL ? "full" : "half");
} else if(!mii_link_ok(&nic->mii) && netif_carrier_ok(nic->netdev)) {
DPRINTK(LINK, INFO, "link down\n");
}
rdtscl(my_tsc_3);
mii_check_link(&nic->mii);
rdtscl(my_tsc_4);
/* Software generated interrupt to recover from (rare) Rx
* allocation failure.
...
And a small module which prints the timings periodically
when loaded:
/* Example module, built after LDD book release 3 */
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/version.h>
#include <linux/errno.h>
#include <linux/timer.h>
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
/* Output interval, in jiffies */
#define INTERVAL 2111
/* Output scaling: TSC ==> microseconds */
#define SCALE(x) ((x)/500)
extern unsigned long my_tsc_1;
extern unsigned long my_tsc_2;
extern unsigned long my_tsc_3;
extern unsigned long my_tsc_4;
static struct timer_list my_timer;
static void timer_func(unsigned long dummy)
{
printk(KERN_NOTICE "my_timer: diff = %lu / %lu / %lu\n",
SCALE(my_tsc_2 - my_tsc_1),
SCALE(my_tsc_3 - my_tsc_2),
SCALE(my_tsc_4 - my_tsc_3));
my_timer.expires += INTERVAL;
add_timer(&my_timer);
}
static int __init mymod_init(void)
{
init_timer(&my_timer);
my_timer.function = timer_func;
my_timer.expires = jiffies + INTERVAL;
add_timer(&my_timer);
printk(KERN_NOTICE "Started mymod...\n");
return 0;
}
static void __exit mymod_exit(void)
{
del_timer_sync(&my_timer);
printk(KERN_NOTICE "Finished mymod...\n");
}
module_init(mymod_init);
module_exit(mymod_exit);
quoted hunk
e100: attempt a shorter delay for mdio reads Signed-off-by: Jesse Brandeburg <redacted> Simply reorder our write/read sequence for mdio reads to minimize latency as well as delay a shorter interval for each loop.diff --git a/drivers/net/e100.c b/drivers/net/e100.c --- a/drivers/net/e100.c +++ b/drivers/net/e100.c@@ -891,23 +891,25 @@ static u16 mdio_ctrl(struct nic *nic, u3 * procedure it should be done under lock. */ spin_lock_irqsave(&nic->mdio_lock, flags); - for (i = 100; i; --i) { + for (i = 1000; i; --i) { if (readl(&nic->csr->mdi_ctrl) & mdi_ready) break; - udelay(20); + udelay(2); } if (unlikely(!i)) { - printk("e100.mdio_ctrl(%s) won't go Ready\n", + DPRINTK(PROBE, ERR, "e100.mdio_ctrl(%s) won'tgo Ready\n", nic->netdev->name ); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&nic->mdio_lock, flags); return 0; /* No way to indicate timeout error */ }
The piece of code above is not yet present in my version of e100. (I'm still at 2.6.15, there is no -rt patch for 2.6.16 yet)
writel((reg << 16) | (addr << 21) | dir | data,
&nic->csr->mdi_ctrl);
- for (i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
- udelay(20);
+ /* to avoid latency, read to flush the write, then
delay, and only
+ * delay 2us per loop, manual says read should complete
in < 64us */
+ for (i = 0; i < 1000; i++) {
if ((data_out = readl(&nic->csr->mdi_ctrl)) & mdi_ready)
break;
+ udelay(2);
}Exchanging the if and the udelay made things slightly worse: It runs with 103 / 136 / 68 instead of 101 / 135 / 67 us. -- Klaus Kusche (Software Development - Control Systems) KEBA AG Gewerbepark Urfahr, A-4041 Linz, Austria (Europe) Tel: +43 / 732 / 7090-3120 Fax: +43 / 732 / 7090-6301 E-Mail: kus@keba.com WWW: www.keba.com