IPv6 Tunneling (reverse tunnel need)
From: Felix Fischer <hidden>
Date: 2005-05-20 11:19:59
I'm currently working on a research project and ran into a question regarding tunneling/decapsulation in IPv6. <------> [ A ] ===== tunnel from A to B =====> [ B ] <-------> Packets tunneled from A to B are only decapsulated at node B if B has setup a tunnel-device in direction from B to A (reverse tunnel). Is the need for the tunnel-device on node B an implementation issue to handle tunneling, or does it come from something else (i.e. standard requirement) ? Further, I am wondering why the possibility to use the ANY_ADDRESS as tunnel-end-point isn't present in IPv6 ? The IPv4 implementation allows the usage of "0.0.0.0" as remote_address for tunnel-end-points. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Regards, Felix Fischer -- ------------------------------------------------------------------- Institute of Communication Networks and Computer Engineering (IKR) University of Stuttgart, Germany -------------------------------------------------------------------