RE: [PATCH] fix BUG in tg3_tx
From: "Michael Chan" <mchan@broadcom.com>
Date: 2004-05-24 17:26:50
David, The producer index of completed tx packets in the status block will always be at whole packet boundaries (1 + the index of the completed packet's last fragment). Even if it is a TSO packet, it will be at the boundaries of entire TSO packets. Michael
-----Original Message----- From: David S. Miller [mailto:davem@redhat.com] Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 10:07 AM To: Greg Banks Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com; Michael Chan Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix BUG in tg3_tx [ Michael, the discussion here is about whether the tigon3 hardware ever partially ACK's completion of a multi-frag TX frame. I believe it never does, but Greg claims he can trigger such a case and has proposed a patch to the tg3 driver which attempts to handle that. ] On Mon, 24 May 2004 18:04:31 +1000 Greg Banks [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 12:40:45AM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:quoted
On Mon, 24 May 2004 17:26:58 +1000 Greg Banks [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
The tg3 transmit code assumes that tg3_tx() will never have to clean up part of an skb queued for transmit. Thisassumption isquoted
quoted
quoted
wrong;Greg, perhaps my reading of the tg3 chip docs is different from yours. The hardware is NEVER supposed to do this.I'd like to know where you read that, because neither I norany of thequoted
other SGI engineers who have read the Broadcom docs canfind any suchquoted
guarantee.The most relevant (and accurate) piece of documentation for the chip is Broadcom's own driver :-) And they do not account at all for such a case of partial-packet TX completion indication. If the first frag is ACK'd they assume the whole packet has been taken. Here is the relevant code from the bcm5700 driver in LM_ServiceTxInterrupt(): while(SwConIdx != HwConIdx) { pPacket = pDevice->SendRing[SwConIdx]; pDevice->SendRing[SwConIdx] = 0; /* Set the return status. */ pPacket->PacketStatus = LM_STATUS_SUCCESS; /* Put the packet in the TxPacketXmittedQ for indication later. */ QQ_PushTail(&pDevice->TxPacketXmittedQ.Container, pPacket); /* Move to the next packet's BD. */ SwConIdx = (SwConIdx + pPacket->u.Tx.FragCount) & T3_SEND_RCB_ENTRY_COUNT_MASK; /* Update the number of unused BDs. */ MM_ATOMIC_ADD(&pDevice->SendBdLeft, pPacket->u.Tx.FragCount); /* Get the new updated HwConIdx. */ HwConIdx = pDevice->pStatusBlkVirt->Idx[0].SendConIdx; } /* while */ Imagine how badly this piece of code would fail if partial ACK'ing of TX packets actually occurred. It would loop past HwConIdx and thus ACK really-not-completed packets, potentially colliding with what the chip is transmitting and thus causing massive data corruption and likely a crash. Actually, it would most likely loop past all valid TX packets and dereference a pPacket NULL pointer.