Re: [PATCH]snmp6 64-bit counter support in proc.c

From: Krishna Kumar <hidden>
Date: 2004-01-23 02:57:16




correctness > performance
I agree with this statement, if every bug is explained as a "very tiny
race"
leads to one large defective product :-)

and performance also need not be hit much if writers are not penalized as I
had suggested earlier...

- KK
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help