Re: [PATCH]snmp6 64-bit counter support in proc.c From: Krishna Kumar <hidden> Date: 2004-01-23 02:57:16 correctness > performance I agree with this statement, if every bug is explained as a "very tiny race" leads to one large defective product :-) and performance also need not be hit much if writers are not penalized as I had suggested earlier... - KK
Keyboard shortcuts hback out one level jnext message in thread kprevious message in thread ldrill in Escclose help / fold thread tree ?toggle this help