Re: [PATCH] IPv6 MIB:ipv6inetNetToMediaTable

From: Shirley Ma <hidden>
Date: 2004-01-15 19:13:03




Why shouldn't the kernel provide the real MIBs information? Is it breaking
any application if I make the right changes?

Thanks
Shirley Ma
IBM Linux Technology Center
15300 SW Koll Parkway
Beaverton, OR 97006-6063
Phone: (503) 578-7638
FAX:      (503) 578-3228



YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
[off-list ref]@cerberus.hongo.wide.ad.jp> on 01/15/2004 10:41:18
AM

Sent by:    "Hideaki YOSHIFUJI" [off-list ref]


To:    Shirley Ma/Beaverton/IBM@IBMUS
cc:    mashirle@us.ltcfwd.linux.ibm.com, davem@redhat.com,
       kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, netdev@oss.sgi.com, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org
Subject:    Re: [PATCH] IPv6 MIB:ipv6inetNetToMediaTable


In article [ref] (at Thu, 15
Jan 2004 10:18:44 -0800), Shirley Ma [off-list ref] says:
Thanks. This is a bug fix for the update value (last change) to be a
TimeStamp according to new IP MIBs. There is no confirm value in the new
IP
MIBs inetNetTomedia Entry, I don't know what's the confirm for, I still
keep it, but change it to TimeStamp. Is there any application using these
values right now? If you agree we can fix any applications reference
these
values.
ditto. application should obtain real MIB information using
information provided by kernel.
(If information is not enough, let kernel provide additional
information.)

--yoshfuji
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help