Re: net/core/flow.c cpu handling?

2 messages, 2 authors, 2003-11-03 · open the first message on its own page

Re: net/core/flow.c cpu handling?

From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Date: 2003-11-03 15:11:45

On Sat, Nov 01, 2003 at 10:50:50PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
Very likely, the code is how it is in order to make the
2.4.x backport of this code and the 2.6.x version as
similar as humanly possible.
Well, the current code is wrong for 2.6 and breaks badly for machines
with more than 32/64 cpus.

-- 
Christoph Hellwig [off-list ref]		-	Freelance Hacker
Contact me for driver hacking and kernel development consulting

Re: net/core/flow.c cpu handling?

From: David S. Miller <hidden>
Date: 2003-11-03 22:55:39

On Mon, 3 Nov 2003 15:11:45 +0000
Christoph Hellwig [off-list ref] wrote:
On Sat, Nov 01, 2003 at 10:50:50PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
quoted
Very likely, the code is how it is in order to make the
2.4.x backport of this code and the 2.6.x version as
similar as humanly possible.
Well, the current code is wrong for 2.6 and breaks badly for machines
with more than 32/64 cpus.
I totally understand, I am in no way trying to justify what
the code is doing.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help