Re: pci-skeleton duplex check

2 messages, 2 authors, 2002-12-14 · open the first message on its own page

Re: pci-skeleton duplex check

From: Michael Richardson <hidden>
Date: 2002-12-14 00:12:21

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
"Donald" == Donald Becker [off-list ref] writes:
    Donald> The drivers in the kernel are now heavily modified and have significantly
    Donald> diverged from my version.  Sure, you are fine with having someone else
    Donald> do the difficult and unrewarding debugging and maintainence work, while
    Donald> you work on just the latest cool hardware, change the interfaces and are
    Donald> concerned only with the current kernel version.

  I agree strongly with Donald.

  Interfaces should NEVER change in patch level versions.
  Just *DO NOT DO IT*.

  Go wild in odd-numbered.. get the interfaces right there.
  But leave them alone afterward.
  
  This is a fundamental tenant of being professional. Otherwise, the kernel
people are the biggest reason I've ever seen for using *BSD.
  Microsoft is not the real enemy. Gratuitous change is.

]       ON HUMILITY: to err is human. To moo, bovine.           |  firewalls  [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON    |net architect[
] mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[
] panic("Just another Debian GNU/Linux using, kernel hacking, security guy"); [




  
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Finger me for keys

iQCVAwUBPfp5IIqHRg3pndX9AQHW7gP9FC0BgskaVBb9HNjKUp8DhR5bJK+YTVa7
YeVGZFRxuFi2O9oDiMuUvYq++y+8PR4LXpJZuNoShA36wqV38QS8pBFhqFt/JrEb
xHNozohQ/7IyncJsG0UkBTfhqIbxbfsd19DUx0ehcqNAh7N3c95qeEEHODTs2DKy
jqtgSrXvOBY=
=JsKT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: pci-skeleton duplex check

From: Oliver Xymoron <hidden>
Date: 2002-12-14 01:36:36

On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 07:19:47PM -0500, Michael Richardson wrote:
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
"Donald" == Donald Becker [off-list ref] writes:
    Donald> The drivers in the kernel are now heavily modified and have significantly
    Donald> diverged from my version.  Sure, you are fine with having someone else
    Donald> do the difficult and unrewarding debugging and maintainence work, while
    Donald> you work on just the latest cool hardware, change the interfaces and are
    Donald> concerned only with the current kernel version.

  I agree strongly with Donald.

  Interfaces should NEVER change in patch level versions.
  Just *DO NOT DO IT*.

  Go wild in odd-numbered.. get the interfaces right there.
  But leave them alone afterward.
Umm, if I recall correctly, they're rehashing a flame war about stuff
that occurred in 2.3. It doesn't need any additional kindling.

-- 
 "Love the dolphins," she advised him. "Write by W.A.S.T.E.." 
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help