# Re: \[RESEND\] tuning linux for high network performance?

- From: bert hubert \<hidden\>
- Date: 2002-10-23 16:54:58 
- List: netdev
- Page: https://ratatoskr.run/netdev/2002/10/499717
- Thread: https://ratatoskr.run/lkml/2002/10/499582/t.md

```text
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 03:42:48PM +0200, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
> > The e1000 can very well do hardware checksumming on transmit.
> >
> > The missing piece of the puzzle is that his application is not
> > using sendfile(), without which no transmit checksum offload
> > can take place.
> 
> As far as I've understood, sendfile() won't do much good with large files. Is 
> this right?

I still refuse to believe that a 1.8GHz Pentium4 can only checksum
250megabits/second. MD Raid5 does better and they probably don't use a
checksum as braindead as that used by TCP.

If the checksumming is not the problem, the copying is, which would be a
weakness of your hardware. The function profiled does both the copying and
the checksumming.

But 250megabits/second also seems low.

Dave? 

Regards,

bert

-- 
http://www.PowerDNS.com          Versatile DNS Software & Services
http://lartc.org           Linux Advanced Routing & Traffic Control HOWTO
```