Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Improvement of Source Address Selection

2 messages, 2 authors, 2002-09-28 · open the first message on its own page

Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Improvement of Source Address Selection

From: <hidden>
Date: 2002-09-28 04:40:27

Hello!
we need per socket preference.
What kind of? Some matching rules loaded to socket by user?

Anyway, rules established by a particular client should be separate,
it is just a generalization of bind()/IP{V6}_PKTINFO.

I am not sure that it is really interesting though. Just now I cannot
imagine what user can invent which is not covered by system-wide rules,
bind() and IP{V6}_PKTINFO. Well, if you think more hairy scheme is interesting,
feel free to implement this.

Alexey

Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Improvement of Source Address Selection

From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <hidden>
Date: 2002-09-28 05:13:04

In article [off-list ref] (at Sat, 28 Sep 2002 08:44:29 +0400 (MSD)), kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru says:
I am not sure that it is really interesting though. Just now I cannot
imagine what user can invent which is not covered by system-wide rules,
bind() and IP{V6}_PKTINFO. Well, if you think more hairy scheme is interesting,
feel free to implement this.
we need per application (per socket) interface
for privacy extension (public address vs temporary address) and 
mobile ip (home address vs care-of address).

--
yoshfuji
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help