3 messages, 3 authors, 2002-09-28 · open the first message on its own page
From: <hidden>
Date: 2002-09-28 02:23:47
Hello!
Otherwise I have no problems with the patch, Alexey?
I have... The implementation is bad. Source address must be retieved from route, not running this elephant function each packet. Alexey
From: Andi Kleen <hidden>
Date: 2002-09-28 02:29:21
On Sat, Sep 28, 2002 at 06:28:29AM +0400, A.N.Kuznetsov wrote:
Hello!quoted
Otherwise I have no problems with the patch, Alexey?I have... The implementation is bad. Source address must be retieved from route, not running this elephant function each packet.
So it just needs to be moved into ip_route_output, right ? -Andi
From: David S. Miller <hidden>
Date: 2002-09-28 02:47:23
From: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2002 06:28:29 +0400 (MSD) > Otherwise I have no problems with the patch, Alexey? I have... The implementation is bad. Source address must be retieved from route, not running this elephant function each packet. This only runs at connect time, and when NULL fl->fl6_src is seen by ip6_build_xmit() (this means RAW,UDP,ICMP which must make these decisions anyways). Is there really so much computation to be saved by moving this to ipv6 route?