Re: [PATCH v2] x86/paravirt: Don't make vcpu_is_preempted() a callee-save function
From: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Date: 2017-02-13 20:12:49
Also in:
kvm, linux-arch, virtualization
From: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Date: 2017-02-13 20:12:49
Also in:
kvm, linux-arch, virtualization
On 02/13/2017 02:42 PM, Waiman Long wrote:
On 02/13/2017 05:53 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:quoted
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 11:47:16AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:quoted
That way we'd end up with something like: asm(" push %rdi; movslq %edi, %rdi; movq __per_cpu_offset(,%rdi,8), %rax; cmpb $0, %[offset](%rax); setne %al; pop %rdi; " : : [offset] "i" (((unsigned long)&steal_time) + offsetof(struct steal_time, preempted))); And if we could get rid of the sign extend on edi we could avoid all the push-pop nonsense, but I'm not sure I see how to do that (then again, this asm foo isn't my strongest point).Maybe: movsql %edi, %rax; movq __per_cpu_offset(,%rax,8), %rax; cmpb $0, %[offset](%rax); setne %al; ?Yes, that looks good to me. Cheers, Longman
Sorry, I am going to take it back. The displacement or offset can only be up to 32-bit. So we will still need to use at least one more register, I think. Cheers, Longman