Thread (23 messages) 23 messages, 5 authors, 2017-02-14

Re: [PATCH v2] x86/paravirt: Don't make vcpu_is_preempted() a callee-save function

From: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Date: 2017-02-13 20:12:49
Also in: kvm, linux-arch, virtualization

On 02/13/2017 02:42 PM, Waiman Long wrote:
On 02/13/2017 05:53 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
quoted
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 11:47:16AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
quoted
That way we'd end up with something like:

asm("
push %rdi;
movslq %edi, %rdi;
movq __per_cpu_offset(,%rdi,8), %rax;
cmpb $0, %[offset](%rax);
setne %al;
pop %rdi;
" : : [offset] "i" (((unsigned long)&steal_time) + offsetof(struct steal_time, preempted)));

And if we could get rid of the sign extend on edi we could avoid all the
push-pop nonsense, but I'm not sure I see how to do that (then again,
this asm foo isn't my strongest point).
Maybe:

movsql %edi, %rax;
movq __per_cpu_offset(,%rax,8), %rax;
cmpb $0, %[offset](%rax);
setne %al;

?
Yes, that looks good to me.

Cheers,
Longman
Sorry, I am going to take it back. The displacement or offset can only
be up to 32-bit. So we will still need to use at least one more
register, I think.

Cheers,
Longman
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help