Thread (4 messages) 4 messages, 2 authors, 2016-06-07

Re: [PATCH] backlight: pwm_bl: disable PWM when 'duty_cycle' is zero

From: Tomi Valkeinen <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-07 08:03:25
Also in: linux-fbdev, linux-pwm

On 07/06/16 09:49, Lothar Waßmann wrote:
Hi,

On Mon, 6 Jun 2016 15:02:21 +0300 Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
quoted
Hi,

On 06/06/16 13:44, Lothar Waßmann wrote:
quoted
'brightness' is usually an index into a table of duty_cycle values,
where the value at index 0 may well be non-zero
(tegra30-apalis-eval.dts and tegra30-colibri-eval-v3.dts are real-life
examples).
Thus brightness == 0 does not necessarily mean that the PWM output
will be inactive.
Check for 'duty_cycle == 0' rather than 'brightness == 0' to decide
whether to disable the PWM.
The binding doc does say:

  - brightness-levels: Array of distinct brightness levels. Typically these
      are in the range from 0 to 255, but any range starting at 0 will do.
      The actual brightness level (PWM duty cycle) will be interpolated
      from these values. 0 means a 0% duty cycle (darkest/off), while the
      last value in the array represents a 100% duty cycle (brightest).
So, what should I do, when I need a range of levels that doesn't start
at 0? E.g. if the brightness is inverse proportional to the PWM duty
cycle.
That's a question to the PWM/backlight maintainers, but I think in the
addition of your patch, the binding doc needs to be changed, as it
doesn't hold true after your patch.

 Tomi

Attachments

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help