Thread (13 messages) 13 messages, 4 authors, 2015-09-29

Re: [PATCH] perf record: Limit --intr-regs to platforms supporting PERF_REGS

From: Jiri Olsa <hidden>
Date: 2015-09-29 06:53:48
Also in: linuxppc-dev
Subsystem: performance events subsystem, the rest · Maintainers: Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Namhyung Kim, Linus Torvalds

On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 11:06:17AM +0530, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
On 2015/09/24 10:15PM, Naveen N Rao wrote:
quoted
On 2015/09/24 08:32AM, Stephane Eranian wrote:
quoted
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 5:57 AM, Jiri Olsa [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 05:41:58PM +0530, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
quoted
perf build currently fails on powerpc:

  LINK     perf
libperf.a(libperf-in.o):(.toc+0x120): undefined reference to
`sample_reg_masks'
libperf.a(libperf-in.o):(.toc+0x130): undefined reference to
`sample_reg_masks'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
make[1]: *** [perf] Error 1
make: *** [all] Error 2

This is due to parse-regs-options.c using sample_reg_masks, which is
defined only with CONFIG_PERF_REGS.

In addition, perf record -I is only useful if the arch supports
PERF_REGS. Hence, let's expose -I conditionally.

Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <redacted>
hum, I wonder why we have sample_reg_masks defined as weak in util/perf_regs.c
which is also built only via CONFIG_PERF_REGS

I wonder we could get rid of the weak definition via attached patch, Stephane?
But the whole point of having it weak is to avoid this error scenario
on any arch without support
and avoid ugly #ifdef HAVE_ in generic files.

if perf_regs.c is compiled on PPC, then why do we get the undefined?
As Jiri Olsa pointed out, powerpc and many other architectures don't 
(yet) have support for perf regs.

But, the larger reason to introduce #ifdef is so the user doesn't see 
options (s)he can't use on a specific architecture, along the same lines 
as builtin-probe.c
Stephane, Arnaldo,
Suka has also posted a fix for this with a different approach [1]. Can 
you please ack/pull one of these versions? Building perf is broken on 
v4.3-rc due to this.
I did not get any answer for additional comments I made to the patch
(couldnt get marc.info working, sending the patch again)
[1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2046370
I dont have this last version, which seems to have other changes
and patch in above link looks mangled, could you please repost it?

thanks,
jirka


---
diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
index 142eeb341b29..19c8fd22fbe3 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
@@ -1082,9 +1082,11 @@ struct option __record_options[] = {
 		    "sample transaction flags (special events only)"),
 	OPT_BOOLEAN(0, "per-thread", &record.opts.target.per_thread,
 		    "use per-thread mmaps"),
+#ifdef HAVE_PERF_REGS_SUPPORT
 	OPT_CALLBACK_OPTARG('I', "intr-regs", &record.opts.sample_intr_regs, NULL, "any register",
 		    "sample selected machine registers on interrupt,"
 		    " use -I ? to list register names", parse_regs),
+#endif
 	OPT_BOOLEAN(0, "running-time", &record.opts.running_time,
 		    "Record running/enabled time of read (:S) events"),
 	OPT_CALLBACK('k', "clockid", &record.opts,
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/Build b/tools/perf/util/Build
index 4bc7a9ab45b1..93c6371405a3 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/Build
+++ b/tools/perf/util/Build
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ libperf-$(CONFIG_LIBBABELTRACE) += data-convert-bt.o
 
 libperf-y += scripting-engines/
 
-libperf-$(CONFIG_PERF_REGS) += perf_regs.o
+libperf-y += perf_regs.o
 libperf-$(CONFIG_ZLIB) += zlib.o
 libperf-$(CONFIG_LZMA) += lzma.o
 
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help