Re: [PATCH 1/12] generic *_bit()
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Date: 2006-02-01 18:02:43
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Date: 2006-02-01 18:02:43
On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 07:11:34AM -0800, Chen, Kenneth W wrote:
Akinobu Mita wrote on Wednesday, January 25, 2006 7:29 PMquoted
This patch introduces the C-language equivalents of the functions below: - atomic operation: void set_bit(int nr, volatile unsigned long *addr); void clear_bit(int nr, volatile unsigned long *addr); void change_bit(int nr, volatile unsigned long *addr); int test_and_set_bit(int nr, volatile unsigned long *addr); int test_and_clear_bit(int nr, volatile unsigned long *addr); int test_and_change_bit(int nr, volatile unsigned long *addr);I wonder why you did not make these functions take volatile unsigned int * address argument?
Because they are defined to operate on arrays of unsigned long